Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
Birmingham Institute for Forest Research and School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Ambio. 2020 Jan;49(1):62-73. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01164-3. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
As evidence for the devastating impacts of air pollution on human health continues to increase, improving urban air quality has become one of the most pressing tasks facing policy makers world-wide. Increasingly, and very often on the basis of conflicting and/or weak evidence, the introduction of green infrastructure (GI) is seen as a win-win solution to urban air pollution, reducing ground-level concentrations without imposing restrictions on traffic and other polluting activities. The impact of GI on air quality is highly context dependent, with models suggesting that GI can improve urban air quality in some situations, but be ineffective or even detrimental in others. Here we set out a novel conceptual framework explaining how and where GI can improve air quality, and offer six specific policy interventions, underpinned by research, that will always allow GI to improve air quality. We call GI with unambiguous benefits for air quality GI4AQ. However, GI4AQ will always be a third-order option for mitigating air pollution, after reducing emissions and extending the distance between sources and receptors.
随着空气污染对人类健康的破坏性影响的证据不断增加,改善城市空气质量已成为全球政策制定者面临的最紧迫任务之一。越来越多的情况下,(人们)常常基于相互矛盾和/或薄弱的证据,将绿色基础设施(GI)的引入视为解决城市空气污染问题的双赢方案,即在不限制交通和其他污染活动的情况下,降低地面浓度。GI 对空气质量的影响高度依赖于具体情况,模型表明 GI 可以在某些情况下改善城市空气质量,但在其他情况下可能无效甚至有害。在这里,我们提出了一个新的概念框架,解释了 GI 如何以及在何处可以改善空气质量,并提供了六项具体的政策干预措施,这些措施以研究为基础,将始终确保 GI 能够改善空气质量。我们将对空气质量具有明确益处的 GI 称为 GI4AQ。然而,GI4AQ 始终是减少排放和延长污染源与受体之间距离之后缓解空气污染的第三级选择。