a Institute of Sport, Exercise, and Health, Otago Polytechnic , Dunedin , New Zealand.
b Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy , University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand.
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jul;37(14):1617-1629. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1578449. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
: Many footwear characteristics are argued as risk factors for running related injuries (RRI). Several footwear assessment tools are available; however, their use in studies of RRI is unknown. : This systematic review evaluated the characteristics and methods of assessing footwear in studies of RRI. : Five online databases were searched for studies on adult runners, in running style footwear, who experienced running-related pain or injury. The methodological quality of included articles was independently assessed by two raters using a modified Downs and Black checklist. Study and participant characteristics, footwear assessment tools used, and footwear characteristics reported were extracted for qualitative synthesis. : Twenty-four articles were included in the review. Low risk of bias was determined for 11 (44%) of the included studies. Twenty-eight different footwear characteristics were grouped into four categories: nomenclature, measurements, qualitative features, and subjective features. Fifteen different methods for assessing the 28 footwear characteristics were reported among the included studies. Only three methods were described previously, as valid and reliable. : Differences in assessing footwear may mask the link between footwear characteristics and injury risk. Systematic footwear assessments and nomenclature are needed to evaluate the effects of footwear characteristics on RRI.
许多鞋类特征被认为是与跑步相关的损伤(RRI)的风险因素。有几种鞋类评估工具可用;然而,它们在 RRI 研究中的使用情况尚不清楚。
本系统评价评估了 RRI 研究中鞋类评估的特征和方法。
在五个在线数据库中搜索了关于成年跑步者、在跑步风格鞋类中、经历过与跑步相关的疼痛或损伤的研究。两名评估员使用改良的唐斯和布莱克清单独立评估纳入文章的方法学质量。提取了研究和参与者特征、使用的鞋类评估工具以及报告的鞋类特征,用于定性综合。
共有 24 篇文章纳入综述。11 项(44%)纳入研究的偏倚风险较低。28 种不同的鞋类特征分为四类:命名、测量、定性特征和主观特征。纳入研究报告了评估 28 种鞋类特征的 15 种不同方法。只有三种方法以前被描述为有效和可靠。
评估鞋类的差异可能掩盖了鞋类特征与受伤风险之间的联系。需要系统的鞋类评估和命名来评估鞋类特征对 RRI 的影响。