Houle Sherilyn K D, Carter Caitlin A, Tsuyuki Ross T, Grindrod Kelly A
School of Pharmacy (Houle, Carter, Grindrod), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
Department of Medicine (Tsuyuki), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2019 Jan 24;152(2):92-108. doi: 10.1177/1715163518811065. eCollection 2019 Mar-Apr.
Recognizing pharmacists' increasing roles as primary care providers, programs offering remuneration for patient care services and the administration of injections by pharmacists continue to be implemented. The objective of this article is to provide an update on remuneration programs available to pharmacists internationally for nondispensing services.
Systematic searches for relevant articles published from January 2013 to February 2018 across PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Cochrane Library, Econlit, Scopus and Web of Science. Gray literature searches, including targeted searches of websites of payers and pharmacy associations, were also performed.
Programs were included if they were newly introduced or had changes to patient eligibility criteria and fees since previously published reviews and if they were established programs offered by third-party payers for activities separate from dispensing.
Descriptive information on each program was extracted, including the program's jurisdiction (country and state, provincial or regional level, as applicable), payer, service description, patient eligibility criteria and fee structure.
Over the 5-year period studied, 95 new programs for noninjection patient care services and 37 programs for pharmacist-administered injections were introduced. Large ranges in fees offered for similar programs were observed across programs, even within the same country or region, at an average of $US 71 for an initial medication review, $19 for follow-ups to these reviews, $18 for prescription adaptations and $13 for injection administration. Apart from some smoking cessation programs in England, which offered incentive payments for successful quits, all services were remunerated on a fee-for-service basis, often in the form of a flat fee regardless of the time spent providing the service.
Although funding for pharmacists' activities continues to show growth, concerns identified in previous reviews persist, including the great variability in remunerated activities, patient eligibility and fees. These issues may limit opportunities for multijurisdictional program and service outcome evaluation. 2019;152:xx-xx.
鉴于药剂师作为初级保健提供者的作用日益增加,为患者护理服务提供报酬以及药剂师进行注射给药的项目仍在持续实施。本文的目的是提供有关国际上药剂师可获得的非配药服务报酬项目的最新情况。
在2013年1月至2018年2月期间,对PubMed(MEDLINE)、Embase、国际药学文摘、Cochrane图书馆、Econlit、Scopus和科学网等数据库中发表的相关文章进行系统检索。还进行了灰色文献检索,包括对付款方和药学协会网站的定向检索。
如果项目是新推出的,或者自之前发表的综述以来患者资格标准和费用有变化,并且是第三方付款方为与配药分开的活动提供的既定项目,则纳入研究。
提取了每个项目的描述性信息,包括项目的管辖范围(适用时为国家和州、省或地区级别)、付款方、服务描述、患者资格标准和费用结构。
在研究的5年期间,推出了95个非注射患者护理服务新项目和37个药剂师注射给药项目。即使在同一国家或地区内,类似项目的收费范围也很大,初次药物审查平均为71美元,这些审查的后续跟进为19美元,处方调整为18美元,注射给药为13美元。除了英格兰的一些戒烟项目为成功戒烟提供激励付款外,所有服务均按服务收费,通常为固定费用,无论提供服务所花费的时间。
尽管药剂师活动的资金继续呈现增长态势,但先前综述中指出的问题仍然存在,包括有偿活动、患者资格和费用的巨大差异。这些问题可能会限制多辖区项目和服务结果评估的机会。2019;152:xx - xx。