Suppr超能文献

每周两次与每周三次中度适形分割放疗治疗前列腺癌:总治疗时间是否重要?

Twice- vs. thrice-weekly moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: does overall treatment time matter?

机构信息

Radiation Oncology Division, Geneva University Hospital, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.

Radiation Oncology, Teknon Oncologic Institute, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun;145(6):1581-1588. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02893-4. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of overall treatment time (OTT) in disease control, acute, and long-term side effects with moderate hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa) delivered either twice- or thrice-a-week.

METHODS

157 patients with localized PCa were treated consecutively with 56 Gy in 4 Gy/fraction delivered either twice (86 patients, from 2003 to 2010, group-1) or thrice a week (71 patients, from 2010 to 2017, group-2) using IMRT or VMAT techniques. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were scored according to the CTCAE v3.0 grading scale. Median follow-up was 110 and 56 months for groups 1 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, patients treated thrice-a-week experienced higher acute ≥ grade-2 GU toxicity compared to those treated twice a week (25.4% vs 5.8%, p = 0.001) even though none presented ≥ grade-3 GU or GI toxicity in the thrice-a-week group. The 5-year ≥ grade-2 late GU toxicity-free survival was higher in group-1 (95.9 ± 2.3%) than in group-2 (81.5 ± 4.9%, p = 0.003), while no differences in ≥ grade-2 late GI toxicity-free survival were observed between both groups (97.5 ± 1.7% vs. 97 ± 2.1% for groups 1 and 2, respectively). The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was not different for patients treated twice compared to those treated thrice-a-week (80.6 ± 4.5% vs. 85.3 ± 4.8%, respectively, p = 0.441), as much as for patients treated in > 5 weeks vs. those treated in ≤ 5 weeks (81.3 ± 4.4% vs. 84.4 ± 5.1%, respectively, p = 0.584).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective hypothesis-generating analysis, less vs. more than 5 weeks OTT may increase acute and late GU toxicities without significantly improving bRFS in patients treated to high effective doses (> 80 Gy) with moderate hypofractionated RT. Prospective trials evaluating the impact of OTT on hypofractionated schedules for PCa are warranted.

摘要

目的

评估前列腺癌患者接受中度适形外照射放疗(RT)时,每周两次或三次治疗的总治疗时间(OTT)对疾病控制、急性和长期副作用的影响。

方法

157 例局限性前列腺癌患者连续接受 56 Gy/4 Gy/fraction 的治疗,86 例患者(2003 年至 2010 年,组 1)接受每周两次治疗,71 例患者(2010 年至 2017 年,组 2)接受每周三次治疗,采用 IMRT 或 VMAT 技术。根据 CTCAE v3.0 分级标准对胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性进行评分。组 1 和组 2 的中位随访时间分别为 110 个月和 56 个月。

结果

在 6 周时,每周三次治疗的患者急性 GU 毒性≥2 级的发生率高于每周两次治疗的患者(25.4%比 5.8%,p=0.001),尽管三次治疗组无≥3 级 GU 或 GI 毒性。5 年时,GU 晚期≥2 级无毒性生存率在组 1 中更高(95.9±2.3%),在组 2 中更低(81.5±4.9%,p=0.003),而两组间 GU 晚期≥2 级无毒性生存率无差异(97.5±1.7%比 97±2.1%,分别为组 1 和组 2)。每周两次治疗和每周三次治疗的患者 5 年生化无复发生存率(bRFS)无差异(80.6±4.5%比 85.3±4.8%,分别为组 1 和组 2),每周治疗时间大于 5 周和小于或等于 5 周的患者 5 年 bRFS 也无差异(81.3±4.4%比 84.4±5.1%,分别为组 1 和组 2)。

结论

在这项回顾性假设生成分析中,OTT 小于或大于 5 周可能会增加急性和晚期 GU 毒性,而不会显著改善接受高有效剂量(>80 Gy)中度适形 RT 治疗的患者的 bRFS。需要前瞻性试验来评估 OTT 对前列腺癌中度分割方案的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验