Kay B
Anaesthesia. 1986 Jun;41(6):589-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb13049.x.
In 42 patients undergoing major surgery, anaesthesia was induced by intravenous alfentanil 10 micrograms/kg together with methohexitone 1.5 mg/kg or propofol 2 mg/kg. An infusion of six times these doses per hour was then started; the rate was varied subsequently as indicated by the monitoring of arterial blood pressure, heart rate, EEG and frontalis electromyogram. The mean duration of infusion was 76.7 minutes for propofol and 74.5 minutes for methohexitone and the infusion was stopped about 10 minutes before the end of surgery in each group. The induction dose differed, but the total dose requirement for the two drugs was similar. In every case, anaesthesia was satisfactory. Methohexitone caused a significant rise in mean pulse rate throughout anaesthesia (p less than 0.05, paired t-test). There was no change in mean pulse rate during propofol infusion. The dose of alfentanil used provided excellent control of autonomic reflexes, with negligible respiratory depression. Naloxone was not required. Propofol provided better anaesthesia than methohexitone, with fewer side effects (p less than 0.05, Chi squared test), easier control of the level of narcosis and faster recovery (p less than 0.001, t-test after log transformation).
42例接受大手术的患者,静脉注射阿芬太尼10微克/千克加美索比妥1.5毫克/千克或丙泊酚2毫克/千克诱导麻醉。然后开始以每小时这些剂量6倍的速度输注;随后根据动脉血压、心率、脑电图和额肌电图监测情况调整输注速度。丙泊酚组平均输注时间为76.7分钟,美索比妥组为74.5分钟,每组在手术结束前约10分钟停止输注。诱导剂量不同,但两种药物的总剂量需求相似。在每种情况下,麻醉效果均令人满意。在整个麻醉过程中,美索比妥使平均脉搏率显著升高(配对t检验,p<0.05)。丙泊酚输注期间平均脉搏率无变化。所用阿芬太尼剂量能很好地控制自主反射,呼吸抑制可忽略不计,无需使用纳洛酮。丙泊酚比美索比妥麻醉效果更好,副作用更少(卡方检验,p<0.05),麻醉深度更容易控制,恢复更快(对数转换后t检验,p<0.001)。