Suppr超能文献

“不要停止相信!”从健康宗教性到促进健康的平等增强诠释学。

"Don't stop believing!" From health religiosity to an equality-enhancing hermeneutic of health promotion.

作者信息

Pelters Britta, Roxberg Åsa

机构信息

a School of Health and Welfare , Halmstad University , Halmstad , Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018;13(sup1):1555420. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1555420.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Health beliefs are usually regarded as subjective understandings of one's health. They can, however, be re-interpreted by drawing on the understanding that the structural features of the health discourse resemble the characteristics of a religion and on the spiritual dimension of health with its possibly salutogenic influence. The applicability of the notion of "health religiosity" and its consequences for individual health promotion are explored.

METHOD

Data consist of already existent semi-structured interviews. These have been reanalyzed in a deductive-hermeneutical way by using a five-dimensional concept of religiosity as deductive template.

RESULTS

The concept of religiosity proved to be productive and revealed that all health dimensions in the case are infused with spiritually ennobled ideas.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, irrespective of their factual accuracy, the salutogenic potential of ennobled ideas may best be utilized by understanding them hermeneutically. An exploration of a narrative hermeneutic approach to individual health promotion is suggested as the merging of meaning horizons in a hermeneutic dialogue is expected to increase awareness of spiritualized aspects of health beliefs. This may mitigate healthism and health disparities. Moreover, three challenges for individual health promotion are anticipated: realizing the situation, recognizing its complexity and resisting a simplistic practical approach.

摘要

目的

健康观念通常被视为对个人健康的主观理解。然而,通过借鉴健康话语的结构特征类似于宗教特征这一理解以及健康的精神维度及其可能的健康促进影响,可以对其进行重新诠释。探讨了“健康宗教性”概念的适用性及其对个体健康促进的影响。

方法

数据由已有的半结构化访谈组成。通过使用宗教性的五维概念作为演绎模板,以演绎诠释的方式对这些访谈进行了重新分析。

结果

宗教性概念被证明是富有成效的,并揭示出该案例中的所有健康维度都充满了精神上高尚的观念。

结论

我们得出结论,无论其事实准确性如何,高尚观念的健康促进潜力最好通过诠释学的方式来理解和利用。建议探索一种叙事诠释学方法来促进个体健康,因为在诠释学对话中意义视界的融合有望提高对健康观念中精神化方面的认识。这可能会减轻健康主义和健康差距。此外,预计个体健康促进面临三个挑战:认识现状、认识其复杂性以及抵制简单化的实用方法。

相似文献

1
"Don't stop believing!" From health religiosity to an equality-enhancing hermeneutic of health promotion.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018;13(sup1):1555420. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1555420.
3
A Narrative Approach to Spirituality and Spiritual Care in Health Care.
J Relig Health. 2020 Jun;59(3):1524-1540. doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00912-9.
4
Religiosity/Spirituality Matters on Plant-Based Local Medical System.
J Relig Health. 2018 Oct;57(5):1948-1960. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0634-y.
7
Is religiosity a protective factor against substance use in young adulthood? Only if you're straight!
J Adolesc Health. 2007 May;40(5):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.11.144. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
8
The meaning of religion/religiosity for the elderly.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71 Suppl 2:770-776. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0120.
9
Spiritual care in nursing: a concept analysis.
Int Nurs Rev. 2014 Jun;61(2):211-9. doi: 10.1111/inr.12099. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives on equal health and well-being.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1679589. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1679589.

本文引用的文献

1
Spirituality, religiosity, aging and health in global perspective: A review.
SSM Popul Health. 2016 May 10;2:373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.04.009. eCollection 2016 Dec.
2
Religiousness and Mental Health: Systematic Review Study.
J Relig Health. 2016 Dec;55(6):1929-37. doi: 10.1007/s10943-014-9896-1.
3
The utility of salutogenesis for guiding health promotion: the case for young people's well-being.
Health Promot Int. 2017 Aug 1;32(4):723-733. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw008.
4
Religion, spirituality, and physical health in cancer patients: A meta-analysis.
Cancer. 2015 Nov 1;121(21):3760-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29353. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
5
From shame to shame resilience: narratives of counselor trainees with eating issues.
Qual Health Res. 2015 Feb;25(2):153-67. doi: 10.1177/1049732314551988. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes (review).
Oncol Rep. 2013 Sep;30(3):1019-29. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2541. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
7
Insights into the concept and measurement of health literacy from a study of shared decision-making in a low literacy population.
J Health Psychol. 2013 Aug;18(8):1011-22. doi: 10.1177/1359105312468192. Epub 2013 May 15.
8
Understanding critical health literacy: a concept analysis.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 18;13:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-150.
9
Young people and health: towards a new conceptual framework for understanding empowerment.
Health (London). 2014 Jan;18(1):3-22. doi: 10.1177/1363459312473616. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
10
[Cancer personality: the resistable descent of a myth].
MMW Fortschr Med. 2011 Dec 1;153(48):38-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03369160.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验