Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎患者使用高成本抗炎药物的依从性、持续性和支出:一项探索性研究。

Adherence, Persistence, and Expenditures for High-Cost Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Exploratory Study.

机构信息

1 University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle.

2 Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, Washington.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Apr;25(4):461-467. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.4.461.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drugs for inflammatory conditions are one of the highest expenditure therapeutic classes for health plans. Published literature for adherence, persistence, nonadherence risk factors, and health care costs are incomplete for newer biologic agents.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) examine differences in adherence, persistence, switch patterns, and health care costs among high-cost specialty anti-inflammatory medications and (b) suggest risk factors for nonadherence in rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

In this exploratory retrospective cohort study, we used medical and pharmacy claims from 1.2 million enrollees in commercial health plans administrated by Premera Blue Cross, the largest not-for-profit health plan in the Pacific Northwest. We included members with rheumatoid arthritis who used the following high-cost disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: abatacept, adalimumab, anakinra, apremilast, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, sekukinumab, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, and ustekinumab. Adherence was calculated via medication possession ratio. Persistence was calculated as the amount of days between the initial fill and final fill plus days supply. Switch rates for adalimumab and etanercept were calculated as the percentage of members who switched to another target drug during the observation period. Direct medical costs (total health care costs) and health care costs excluding specialty agents were calculated using the net allowable amount per claim for the duration of each therapy. Adherence, persistence, and costs of care were also examined for concurrent methotrexate use for the most used target drugs.

RESULTS

The most commonly used drugs were abatacept (n = 47), adalimumab (n = 226), and etanercept (n = 252). Nonadherence in certain subgroups was associated with higher mean monthly health care costs, excluding specialty agents (etanercept cohort: +$1,063 for nonmethotrexate users; +$492 for nonadherent methotrexate users), but adherence was associated with higher total health care costs (+$883 for etanercept). Relative to specialty pharmacies, retail was associated with 9% higher nonadherence. Concurrent methotrexate use was associated with higher persistence (+307 and +192 days with adalimumab and etanercept). The most commonly switched-to drug after adalimumab/etanercept was abatacept (n = 39).

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study raises signals suggesting that retail pharmacies may be associated with higher nonadherence; nonadherence may be associated with increased health care costs, excluding specialty agents; adherence may increase total health care costs; and methotrexate use may be associated with increased persistence. Future research should confirm these findings.

DISCLOSURES

This research was part of an internship awarded to Khilfeh by the AMCP Foundation/Pfizer Summer Internship Program and funded by Pfizer. Gross is an employee of Pfizer. The other authors have nothing to disclose. A portion of this research was presented at the AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting as a continuing education session entitled "The Evolving Role of Real-World Data in Health Care Decision Making" on March 29, 2017, in Denver, CO, and at AMCP Nexus 2016 as a poster on October 3-6, 2016, in National Harbor, MD.

摘要

背景

对于健康计划而言,用于炎症性疾病的药物是医疗支出最高的治疗类别之一。关于新的生物制剂的依从性、持续性、不依从风险因素和医疗保健成本的文献并不完整。

目的

(a)研究高成本专科抗炎药物之间的依从性、持续性、转换模式和医疗保健成本的差异,以及(b)确定类风湿关节炎不依从的风险因素。

方法

在这项探索性回顾性队列研究中,我们使用了西北太平洋地区最大的非营利性健康计划 Premera Blue Cross 管理的 120 万商业健康计划成员的医疗和药房索赔数据。我们纳入了使用以下高成本疾病修饰抗风湿药物的类风湿关节炎患者:阿巴西普、阿达木单抗、阿那白滞素、阿普司特、依那西普、戈利木单抗、英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗、司库奇尤单抗、托珠单抗、托法替布和乌司奴单抗。通过药物占有比来计算依从性。持续性通过初始剂量与最后剂量之间的天数和药物供应天数来计算。阿达木单抗和依那西普的转换率是在观察期内转换为另一种目标药物的成员百分比。通过每个治疗期间每个索赔的净允许金额计算直接医疗成本(总医疗保健成本)和不包括专科代理的医疗保健成本。还检查了最常用的目标药物同时使用甲氨蝶呤的依从性、持续性和医疗保健成本。

结果

最常用的药物是阿巴西普(n=47)、阿达木单抗(n=226)和依那西普(n=252)。某些亚组的不依从性与更高的平均每月医疗保健成本(不包括专科代理)相关(依那西普队列:甲氨蝶呤非使用者为+1063 美元;甲氨蝶呤不依从者为+492 美元),但依从性与更高的总医疗保健成本相关(依那西普为+883 美元)。与专科药房相比,零售药房与 9%的更高不依从率相关。与阿达木单抗和依那西普相比,转换为阿巴西普的患者最多(n=39)。

结论

这项探索性研究表明,零售药房可能与更高的不依从率有关;不依从可能与专科代理之外的医疗保健成本增加有关;依从性可能会增加总医疗保健成本;并且使用甲氨蝶呤可能与持续性增加有关。未来的研究应该证实这些发现。

披露

这项研究是 Khilfeh 获得 AMCP 基金会/辉瑞暑期实习计划奖学金的一部分,并由辉瑞资助。Gross 是辉瑞公司的员工。其他作者没有什么可披露的。本研究的一部分内容在 2017 年 3 月 29 日在科罗拉多州丹佛举行的 AMCP 管理式医疗和专科药房年会的继续教育课程“真实世界数据在医疗保健决策中的不断发展作用”上进行了介绍,并在 2016 年 10 月 3 日至 6 日在马里兰州国家港举行的 AMCP Nexus 2016 上以海报形式进行了介绍。

相似文献

2
Effectiveness and Costs Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Targeted Immunomodulators Using Real-World U.S. Data.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Aug;26(8):1039-1049. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.8.1039.
10
Cost of biologic treatment persistence or switching in rheumatoid arthritis.
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jul;24(8 Spec No.):SP338-SP345.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in plant-derived vesicle like nanoparticles-based therapies for inflammatory diseases.
Asian J Pharm Sci. 2025 Aug;20(4):101052. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2025.101052. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
Adherence to the antirheumatic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 12;11:1456251. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1456251. eCollection 2024.
4
Development of a sensitive biochemical assay for the detection of tofacitinib adherence.
Anal Methods. 2023 Apr 6;15(14):1797-1801. doi: 10.1039/d2ay01800d.
5
Pathologically triggered aggregation of nanoparticles for inflammation-targeting amplification and therapeutic potentiation.
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023 Jan;13(1):390-409. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
6
Proposal of International Council for Harmonization (ICH) Guideline for the Approval of Biosimilars.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2022 Nov 17;11(1):2147286. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2022.2147286. eCollection 2023.
7
Adherence and persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at an integrated health system specialty pharmacy.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jul;27(7):882-890. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.7.882.
10
Bioresponsive drug delivery systems for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.
J Control Release. 2020 Nov 10;327:641-666. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost of biologic treatment persistence or switching in rheumatoid arthritis.
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jul;24(8 Spec No.):SP338-SP345.
2
Two-year adherence and costs for biologic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jul;24(8 Spec No.):SP315-SP321.
3
Treatment Patterns of Newly Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients from a Commercially Insured Population.
Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):355-369. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0114-6. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Persistence, switch rates, drug consumption and costs of biological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study in Italy.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Dec 21;9:9-17. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S108730. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验