Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Faculty of Medical Sciences of Campinas State University (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Faculty of Medical Sciences of Campinas State University (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Apr;113:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance and the clinical benefit of Shear-Wave Elastography - Virtual Touch Imaging Quantification (SWE-VTIQ) as a complement to ultrasonography (US).
From October 2016 through Jun 2017, B-mode US and SWE-VTIQ were prospectively performed in 396 breast masses in 357 women who consented to undergo this study. Quantitative elastography values were recorded: V (maximum elasticity), V (median elasticity), V (ratio of V and surrounding parenchyma) and V (ratio of V and surrounding parenchyma). The histopathology of the lesions was considered the reference standard for benign or malignant definition. The performance of the four elastographic parameters was evaluated trough sensitivity, specificity and AUC. The parameter with the best performance was tested in six different diagnostic approaches defined based on clinical practice.
Of the 396 masses, 122 (30.8%) were benign and 274 (69.2%) were malignant. All SWE parameters were significantly higher in malignant masses (all p < 0.01). V and V performed significantly better then V (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). SWE-VTIQ improved US specificity in all diagnostic approaches, except when applied to BI-RADS 3 lesions. SWE-VTIQ reduced the false positive rate in 25% if applied only to BI-RADS 4A masses, maintaining a high sensitivity (98.9%, 95% confidence interval 97.1-100%) and a negative predictive value of 95.5%. When applied to BI-RADS 4A and 4B masses, SWE-VTIQ reduced the false positive rate in 54.4%. However, 13 malignant cases would be missed in this approach (4.7% of all malignant cases).
SWE-VTIQ increases US specificity when applied to BI-RADS 4 A lesions, significantly reducing unnecessary interventions and preserving the diagnosis of malignant lesions. When applied also to BI-RADS® 4B lesions, SWE-VTIQ increases the number of false negative cases, which should be evaluated with caution.
评估剪切波弹性成像-虚拟触诊成像定量(SWE-VTIQ)作为超声(US)补充的诊断性能和临床获益。
2016 年 10 月至 2017 年 6 月,对 357 名同意进行此项研究的女性的 396 个乳腺肿块进行了 B 型超声和 SWE-VTIQ 前瞻性检查。记录定量弹性成像值:V(最大弹性)、V(中位弹性)、V(V 与周围实质的比值)和 V(V 与周围实质的比值)。病变的组织病理学被认为是良性或恶性定义的参考标准。通过敏感性、特异性和 AUC 评估了四个弹性参数的性能。根据临床实践定义的六种不同诊断方法测试了性能最佳的参数。
396 个肿块中,122 个(30.8%)为良性,274 个(69.2%)为恶性。恶性肿块的所有 SWE 参数均显著升高(均 P<0.01)。V 和 V 的表现明显优于 V(P=0.01 和 P=0.03)。SWE-VTIQ 提高了所有诊断方法的 US 特异性,除了应用于 BI-RADS 3 病变时。如果仅应用于 BI-RADS 4A 肿块,SWE-VTIQ 将假阳性率降低 25%,同时保持 98.9%(95%置信区间 97.1-100%)的高敏感性和 95.5%的阴性预测值。当应用于 BI-RADS 4A 和 4B 肿块时,SWE-VTIQ 将假阳性率降低了 54.4%。然而,在这种方法中会错过 13 例恶性病例(所有恶性病例的 4.7%)。
SWE-VTIQ 应用于 BI-RADS 4A 病变时可提高 US 的特异性,显著减少不必要的干预,并保留恶性病变的诊断。当也应用于 BI-RADS® 4B 病变时,SWE-VTIQ 会增加假阴性病例的数量,对此应谨慎评估。