Suppr超能文献

健康不吸烟者、健康吸烟者和 COPD 患者的胸壁运动的可靠性及其与肺功能的相关性。

Reliability of Chest Wall Mobility and Its Correlation with Lung Functions in Healthy Nonsmokers, Healthy Smokers, and Patients with COPD.

机构信息

Department of Medical Rehabilitation, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Can Respir J. 2019 Feb 25;2019:5175949. doi: 10.1155/2019/5175949. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Chest wall circumference measurements are common evaluation methods in clinical settings by therapists in order to obtain chest wall mobility. Previous published results have been conflicting, and there is a lot of variability in the method of testing, which needs testing in different conditions. Seventy subjects (25 healthy nonsmokers, 25 healthy smokers, and 20 COPD) aged between 18 and 70 years participated in the study. Upper and lower chest expansion (CE) measurements (2 levels) are performed with cloth inch tape. Intrarater (between day) and interrater (within-day) reliability of CE measurements was evaluated by two examiners. Lung function parameters, forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, and vital capacity (VC) were measured using a computerized spirometer (Spiro lab 3). The intrarater reliability for upper and lower CE showed with intraclass correlation (ICC) values between 0.90 and 0.93 for upper CE and 0.85 to 0.86 for lower CE. The interrater reliability for upper CE showed good to with ICC values ranging between 0.78 and 0.83, and lower CE showed with ICC values ranging between 0.82 and 0.84. Upper and lower CE showed a significant and positive correlation with all lung function parameters, with strong correlation with FEV1/FVC ( = 0.68). Upper and lower CE measurements with inch tape showed good intra- and interrater reliability and reproducibility in healthy nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and COPD subjects. Compared to upper, lower CE correlated well with the lung function parameters. Upper and lower CE may be more useful in clinical practice to evaluate chest mobility and to give indirect information on lung function but interpretation with caution is required when considering implementation into clinical setting.

摘要

胸廓周长测量是治疗师在临床环境中常用的评估方法,目的是获得胸廓活动度。既往发表的结果存在矛盾,且测试方法存在很大差异,需要在不同条件下进行测试。本研究共纳入 70 名受试者(25 名健康不吸烟者、25 名健康吸烟者和 20 名 COPD 患者),年龄在 18 至 70 岁之间。使用布质英寸带进行上、下胸廓扩张(CE)测量(2 个水平)。两名检查者评估 CE 测量的组内(日间)和组间(日内)可靠性。使用计算机化肺活量计(Spiro lab 3)测量肺功能参数,包括第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、FEV1/FVC 和肺活量(VC)。上、下 CE 的组内可靠性的组内相关系数(ICC)值分别为 0.90 至 0.93,上 CE 为 0.85 至 0.86,下 CE 为 0.82 至 0.84。上 CE 的组间可靠性为良好至极好,ICC 值在 0.78 至 0.83 之间,下 CE 的组间可靠性为极好,ICC 值在 0.82 至 0.84 之间。上、下 CE 与所有肺功能参数均呈显著正相关,与 FEV1/FVC 相关性最强( = 0.68)。布质英寸带的上、下 CE 测量在健康不吸烟者、健康吸烟者和 COPD 患者中具有良好的组内和组间可靠性和可重复性。与上 CE 相比,下 CE 与肺功能参数具有良好的相关性。上、下 CE 可能更有助于临床实践评估胸廓活动度,并提供关于肺功能的间接信息,但在考虑将其纳入临床实践时需要谨慎解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae9b/6410441/c1367d0458d5/CRJ2019-5175949.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验