Nelson S, Milgrom P, Albert J M, Selvaraj D, Cunha-Cruz J, Curtan S, Copeland T, Heima M, Rothen M, Beck G, Ferretti G, Riedy C
Department of Community Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Oct;4(4):323-332. doi: 10.1177/2380084419830662. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
School screening and the note home (pinned to a backpack) informing parents/caregivers that their child needs to see a dentist have not been effective.
The Family Access to a Dentist Study (FADS) evaluated the effectiveness of school interventions based on the common-sense model of self-regulation (CSM) among K-4 children needing restorative treatment.
FADS was a multisite double-blind randomized controlled trial with 5 arms. FADS tested a CSM-driven referral letter and dental information guide (DIG) to move caregivers from inaccurate to accurate perceptions of dental caries. Six school districts from Ohio and Washington (14 schools) participated in school years 2015 to 2016 and 2016 to 2017. A total of 611 caregivers were randomized, and 86% ( = 597 children) completed the exit examination. The primary outcome was receipt of care based on a change in oral health status determined clinically within 1 school year.
In accordance with our primary aims, 5 arms were collapsed into 3: CSM letter and reduced CSM letter (combined), CSM letter + DIG and reduced CSM letter + reduced DIG (combined), and standard letter. Among all sites, 39.7% received restorative care (237 of 597). Combined analysis of sites revealed that the CSM referral letter (with and without the DIG) did not increase dental visits when compared with the standard letter. However, for combined sites (East Cleveland, Ohio; Washington), the CSM + DIG increased dental visits when compared with standard letter in univariate analysis (51.3% vs. 40.9%), indicating 1.6-times increased odds of a dental visit (95% CI, 0.97 to 2.58) after imputation and adjustment for covariates. The CSM + DIG group had 1.9-times increased odds (95% CI, 1.21 to 3.08) of care when compared the CSM letter alone.
A CSM-driven approach to informing caregivers of the chronic nature of caries with resources in an illustrative manner can increase the benefit of school oral health screening (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02395120).
A school dental referral (note home) that tells a parent that the child has cavities has not been effective. In this trial, a referral based on the common-sense model of self-regulation increased follow-up care for children with restorative needs.
学校筛查以及给家长/照顾者的告知信(别在书包上),告知他们孩子需要看牙医,这些措施并未起到有效作用。
家庭看牙医研究(FADS)评估了基于自我调节常识模型(CSM)的学校干预措施对需要修复治疗的幼儿园至四年级儿童的有效性。
FADS是一项多地点双盲随机对照试验,有5个干预组。FADS测试了一封由CSM驱动的转诊信和一份牙科信息指南(DIG),以使照顾者对龋齿的认知从不准确转变为准确。来自俄亥俄州和华盛顿州的6个学区(14所学校)参与了2015至2016学年以及2016至2017学年的研究。共有611名照顾者被随机分组,86%(n = 597名儿童)完成了最终检查。主要结局是根据在1个学年内临床确定的口腔健康状况变化来确定是否接受了治疗。
根据我们的主要目标,5个干预组合并为3组:CSM信和简化CSM信(合并)、CSM信 + DIG和简化CSM信 + 简化DIG(合并),以及标准信。在所有地点,39.7%的儿童接受了修复治疗(597名儿童中的237名)。对各地点的综合分析显示,与标准信相比,CSM转诊信(无论有无DIG)并未增加看牙次数。然而,对于合并地点(俄亥俄州东克利夫兰市;华盛顿州),在单因素分析中,与标准信相比,CSM + DIG增加了看牙次数(51.3%对40.9%),这表明在对协变量进行归因和调整后,看牙的几率增加了1.6倍(95%CI,0.97至2.58)。与仅使用CSM信的组相比,CSM + DIG组接受治疗的几率增加了1.9倍(95%CI,1.21至3.08)。
一种由CSM驱动的方法,以一种直观的方式向照顾者告知龋齿的慢性性质并提供相关资源,可以增加学校口腔健康筛查的益处(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02395120)。
学校的牙科转诊信(给家长的告知信)告知家长孩子有龋齿,但并未起到有效作用。在本试验中,基于自我调节常识模型的转诊增加了有修复需求儿童的后续治疗。