Spittler Raphael, Bahlke Fabian, Hoffmann Boris A, Theis Cathrin, Mollnau Hanke, Marx Alexandra, Ocete Blanca Quesada, Ilioska Pamela, Lange Björn, Konrad Torsten, Rostock Thomas
Department of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;30(7):1026-1035. doi: 10.1111/jce.13947. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
Procedural atrial fibrillation (AF) termination is considered as a predictor of long-term success after catheter ablation for persistent AF (persAF). However, some patients remain free of arrhythmia recurrences despite failure to achieve AF termination. The objective of this study was to assess long-term outcome and prognostic factors in patients undergoing complex ablation without procedural AF termination.
This study comprised 419 patients (63.8 ± 10.2 years, 63.4% male) undergoing complex ablation for persAF. Patients without procedural AF termination (n = 137, 64.2 ± 9.7 years, 63.5% male) were categorized into patients who remained in sinus rhythm (SR) in long-term outcome (SR-group) and patients with recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) (AR-group). During a follow-up (FU) of 19.6 ± 14.6 months, the SR-group consisted of 65 (47.5%) and the AR-group of 69 (50.4%) patients. Three patients (2.2%) were lost to FU. Left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocity and left atrium volume index (LAVI) could be identified as predictors for long-term success. LAA flow velocity and baseline AF cycle length (AFCL) were significantly associated with the type of arrhythmia recurrence (AF vs AT), ie, higher values of both are predictive for AT rather than AF recurrences. Patients with a LAVI < 34.4 mL/m² and significant AFCL increase during the ablation procedure had rather AT than AF recurrences.
Patients with an arrhythmia-free outcome despite failure of procedural AF termination during complex ablation for persAF are characterized by specific morphological and functional properties that are easy to obtain.
程序性房颤(AF)终止被视为持续性房颤(persAF)导管消融术后长期成功的预测指标。然而,一些患者尽管未能实现房颤终止,但仍未出现心律失常复发。本研究的目的是评估未实现程序性房颤终止的复杂消融患者的长期结局和预后因素。
本研究纳入了419例接受persAF复杂消融的患者(63.8±10.2岁,男性占63.4%)。未实现程序性房颤终止的患者(n = 137,64.2±9.7岁,男性占63.5%)被分为长期结局为窦性心律(SR)的患者(SR组)和房颤或房性心动过速(AT)复发的患者(AR组)。在19.6±14.6个月的随访(FU)期间,SR组有65例患者(47.5%),AR组有69例患者(50.4%)。3例患者(2.2%)失访。左心耳(LAA)流速和左心房容积指数(LAVI)可被确定为长期成功的预测指标。LAA流速和基线房颤周期长度(AFCL)与心律失常复发类型(房颤与AT)显著相关,即两者值越高,预测AT复发而非房颤复发的可能性越大。LAVI < 34.4 mL/m²且消融过程中AFCL显著增加的患者更容易出现AT而非房颤复发。
在persAF复杂消融过程中尽管程序性房颤终止失败但仍无心律失常结局的患者具有易于获得的特定形态学和功能特性。