Suppr超能文献

一项计算机规划研究比较了 3D-CRT、IMRT 和质子束治疗胸腺瘤患者的剂量和估计毒性风险。

An in silico planning study comparing doses and estimated risk of toxicity in 3D-CRT, IMRT and proton beam therapy of patients with thymic tumours.

机构信息

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2019 Apr;60:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.028. Epub 2019 Mar 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the dose distributions produced in patients (pts) treated for thymic tumours with spot-scanning proton beam therapy (PBT) implemented with single-field uniform dose (SFUD), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal photon-beam based radiotherapy (3D-CRT).

METHODS

Twelve pts, treated with 3D-CRT, were included. Alternative IMRT and SFUD plans were constructed. The IMRT plans were created using a setup with beams incident from 5 to 6 different angles. For the SFUD plans, a field-specific planning target volume (PTV) was created for each patient and a clinical target volume (CTV)-based robust optimization was performed. A robustness evaluation was performed for the CTV for all SFUD plans. A dosimetric evaluation was conducted for the doses to the CTV and organs at risk (OARs) for all plans. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), for different endpoints, was calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB)-model and compared between plans.

RESULTS

SFUD was associated with significantly lower mean doses to the oesophagus, the heart, the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), lungs and breasts compared to 3D-CRT and IMRT. The maximum dose given to the spinal cord was significantly lower with SFUD. The risks for pneumonitis, esophagitis and myelopathy were significantly reduced in the SFUD plans.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed dosimetric advantages of using scanned-beam PBT for the treatment of thymic tumours, as compared to 3D-CRT and IMRT, especially in regard to lower doses to the oesophagus and lungs. The risk of toxicity was reduced with SFUD.

摘要

目的

比较采用单点扫描质子束治疗(PBT)实施的单野均匀剂量(SFUD)、调强放疗(IMRT)和基于三维适形光子束的放疗(3D-CRT)治疗胸腺瘤患者的剂量分布。

方法

纳入 12 例接受 3D-CRT 治疗的患者。构建了替代的 IMRT 和 SFUD 计划。IMRT 计划是使用从 5 到 6 个不同角度入射的光束设置创建的。对于 SFUD 计划,为每个患者创建了一个特定于射野的计划靶区(PTV),并进行了基于临床靶区(CTV)的稳健优化。对所有 SFUD 计划的 CTV 进行了稳健性评估。对所有计划的 CTV 和危及器官(OAR)的剂量进行了剂量评估。使用 Lyman-Kutcher-Burman(LKB)模型计算了不同终点的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP),并对计划进行了比较。

结果

与 3D-CRT 和 IMRT 相比,SFUD 显著降低了食管、心脏、左前降支冠状动脉(LAD)、肺和乳房的平均剂量。SFUD 显著降低了脊髓的最大剂量。SFUD 计划中肺炎、食管炎和脊髓病的风险显著降低。

结论

与 3D-CRT 和 IMRT 相比,本研究表明,与 3D-CRT 和 IMRT 相比,使用扫描束 PBT 治疗胸腺瘤具有剂量学优势,特别是在食管和肺部的剂量较低方面。SFUD 降低了毒性风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验