Suppr超能文献

认知行为疗法治疗初级保健中的抑郁和焦虑:使用荟萃回归中的稳健方差估计进行二次荟萃分析综述。

Cognitive behavioral therapy for primary care depression and anxiety: a secondary meta-analytic review using robust variance estimation in meta-regression.

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 S. University Ave., School of Social Work Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Steve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Med. 2019 Dec;42(6):1117-1141. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00046-z. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is well supported for treating depressive and anxiety disorders. Trials of CBT for anxiety and depression in primary care have increased over the past decade, yet only one meta-analysis, published in 2015, examined this topic and the scope of that review is relatively narrow. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of primary care based CBT for depression and anxiety. A search of seven electronic databases, six professional websites, and reference lists from articles meeting inclusion criteria was conducted for studies published between 1900 and November 2018. Fifty-seven eligible studies (including 10,701 participants; 221 effect sizes) of randomized controlled trials were eligible and included for meta-analysis using robust variance estimation in meta-regression. Outcome indicators were depression and anxiety measures. An overall significant treatment effect, d = 0.400, 95% CI (0.235, 0.566), p < 0.001, of CBT for depression and anxiety disorders in primary care was identified. Subgroup analyses indicated significant treatment effect for: (1) depressive (d = 0.425, p < 0.001) and anxiety (d = 0.393, p < 0.01) outcomes, (2) studies conducted inside primary care (d = 0.412, p < 0.001), (3) studies using individual-based CBT (d = 0.412, p < 0.001), (4) studies without primary care physician involvement (d = 0.395, p < 0.001), and (5) studies using both tele-health (d = 0.563, p < 0.001) and in-person CBT (d = 0.363, p < 0.001). The percentage of White participants, treatment composition (CBT only versus CBT + other approaches), and treatment duration were significant moderators. Implications for clinical practice are discussed based on both moderator and subgroup analysis results.

摘要

认知行为疗法(CBT)在治疗抑郁和焦虑障碍方面得到了很好的支持。在过去十年中,针对初级保健中的焦虑和抑郁进行的 CBT 试验有所增加,但只有一项发表于 2015 年的荟萃分析对此主题进行了研究,而且该综述的范围相对较窄。本研究对基于初级保健的 CBT 治疗抑郁和焦虑进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。对 1900 年至 2018 年 11 月期间发表的符合纳入标准的文章,从七个电子数据库、六个专业网站和参考文献中进行了搜索。共有 57 项合格的随机对照试验研究(包括 10701 名参与者;221 个效应量)符合纳入标准,并在荟萃回归中使用稳健方差估计进行了荟萃分析。结果指标为抑郁和焦虑测量。研究发现,初级保健中 CBT 对抑郁和焦虑障碍的总体治疗效果显著,d=0.400,95%CI(0.235,0.566),p<0.001。亚组分析表明,CBT 对以下方面具有显著的治疗效果:(1)抑郁(d=0.425,p<0.001)和焦虑(d=0.393,p<0.01)结局,(2)在初级保健内部进行的研究(d=0.412,p<0.001),(3)使用个体 CBT 的研究(d=0.412,p<0.001),(4)不涉及初级保健医生的研究(d=0.395,p<0.001),以及(5)同时使用远程医疗(d=0.563,p<0.001)和面对面 CBT(d=0.363,p<0.001)的研究。参与者中白人的比例、治疗组成(仅 CBT 与 CBT+其他方法)和治疗持续时间是显著的调节因素。基于调节因素和亚组分析结果,讨论了对临床实践的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验