• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者自行填写的用药史在急诊科的准确性。

Accuracy of patient self-administered medication history forms in the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Level 5, Building 65, Missenden Road, Camperdown, 2050, Australia.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Level 5, Building 65, Missenden Road, Camperdown, 2050, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;38(1):50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.04.016
PMID:31005394
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of patients with medication discrepancies when using a self-administered medication history form in the emergency department (ED). The secondary objectives were to identify predictors of medication discrepancies and determine the proportion of patients with a high-risk medication discrepancy.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in an urban ED in Australia. Patients completed a self-administered medication history form while waiting to be seen by a physician. Subsequently, a best possible medication history was taken by a pharmacist to determine accuracy of the self-reported medication lists for patients with planned admissions. Discrepancies between the two medication lists were reported descriptively. A Poisson regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of the rate of discrepancies. Associations were reported as incident rate ratios (IRR).

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were included in the study. The total number of discrepancies was as follows: 0 (25%, n = 34), 1 (34%, n = 47), 2 (11%, n = 15), and ≥3 (30%, n = 42). The number of medications (IRR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.14, p < 0.001), female (IRR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.92, p = 0.001), and missing community pharmacy information (IRR 2.10, 95% CI 1.64 to 2.68, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with rate of discrepancies. Overall, 20% (n = 28) of patients had one or more high-risk medication discrepancies.

CONCLUSION

Patient self-administered medication history forms have a high rate of discrepancies and should be verified by a best possible medication history.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是确定在急诊科使用患者自行填写的用药史表时出现用药差异的患者比例。次要目的是确定用药差异的预测因素,并确定具有高风险用药差异的患者比例。

方法

这是一项在澳大利亚城市急诊科进行的横断面研究。患者在等待医生就诊时填写一份自行管理的用药史表。随后,药剂师会尽可能地获取最佳用药史,以确定计划入院患者自我报告用药清单的准确性。报告了两种用药清单之间的差异。采用泊松回归分析确定差异率的预测因素。关联以发病率比(IRR)表示。

结果

共纳入 138 例患者。差异总数如下:0(25%,n=34)、1(34%,n=47)、2(11%,n=15)和≥3(30%,n=42)。药物数量(IRR 1.11,95%CI 1.09 至 1.14,p<0.001)、女性(IRR 1.51,95%CI 1.18 至 1.92,p=0.001)和缺失社区药房信息(IRR 2.10,95%CI 1.64 至 2.68,p<0.001)与差异率显著相关。总体而言,20%(n=28)的患者有一个或多个高风险用药差异。

结论

患者自行填写的用药史表差异率较高,应通过最佳用药史进行验证。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of patient self-administered medication history forms in the emergency department.患者自行填写的用药史在急诊科的准确性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;38(1):50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
2
Medication list assessment in Spanish hospital emergency departments.西班牙医院急诊科的用药清单评估
J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.063. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
3
The impact of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation during admission at tertiary care hospital.三级护理医院入院期间由药剂师主导的用药核对的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Feb;40(1):196-201. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0568-6. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
4
Patient completion of self-administered medication history forms in the emergency department.患者在急诊科完成自我管理的用药史表格。
Australas Emerg Care. 2019 Jun;22(2):103-106. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
5
Effect of pharmacy-led medication reconciliation in emergency departments: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药学主导的急诊用药重整的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Dec;44(6):932-945. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13019. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Emergency department medication history taking: current inefficiency and potential for a self-administered form.急诊科用药史采集:当前的低效性及自我管理表格的可能性。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
7
A prospective cohort study of medication reconciliation using pharmacy technicians in the emergency department to reduce medication errors among admitted patients.一项前瞻性队列研究,利用急诊科药剂师进行用药核对,以减少住院患者的用药错误。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;48(2):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.09.065. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
8
Accuracy of Electronic Medical Record Medication Reconciliation in Emergency Department Patients.急诊科患者电子病历用药核对的准确性
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.052. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
9
A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study of the effectiveness of a pharmacist-acquired medication history in an emergency department.一项在急诊科评估药师获取用药史的有效性的多中心、双盲、随机、对照、平行分组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 29;13:337. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-337.
10
Application of the structured history taking of medication use tool to optimise prescribing for older patients and reduce adverse events.应用药物使用结构化病史采集工具优化老年患者处方并减少不良事件。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Apr;38(2):374-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0254-0. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The reliability of medical illness reporting in a randomized clinical trial.随机临床试验中医疗疾病报告的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0320759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320759. eCollection 2025.
2
A Prediction Model to Identify Clinically Relevant Medication Discrepancies at the Emergency Department (MED-REC Predictor): Development and Validation Study.一种用于识别急诊科临床相关用药差错的预测模型(MED-REC Predictor):开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 27;26:e55185. doi: 10.2196/55185.
3
Medication reconciliation in pediatrics: a validation of instruments to prevent medication errors.
儿科用药重整:预防用药错误的工具验证。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Mar 6;76(2):e20210755. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0755. eCollection 2023.
4
Association of timing of gabapentinoid use with motor recovery after spinal cord injury.加巴喷丁类药物使用时机与脊髓损伤后运动功能恢复的关系。
Neurology. 2020 Dec 15;95(24):e3412-e3419. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010950. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Survey and electronic health record-based medication use agreement in children with cystic fibrosis: A retrospective cross-sectional study.基于调查和电子健康记录的囊性纤维化儿童用药协议:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Mar;31(2):247-253. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12724. Epub 2020 Sep 30.