Suppr超能文献

大规模的网络相互作用涉及在外部环境和内部思想之间分配注意力,以追求两个截然不同的目标。

Large-scale network interactions involved in dividing attention between the external environment and internal thoughts to pursue two distinct goals.

机构信息

Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, University of Toronto, 3560 Bathurst St, North York, ON, M6A 2E1, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 140 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16801, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 15;197:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.054. Epub 2019 Apr 21.

Abstract

Previous research suggests that default-mode network (DMN) and dorsal attention network (DAN) are involved in internally- and externally-directed attention, respectively, through interactions with salience network (SN) and frontoparietal network (FPCN). Performing a task requiring external attention is often accompanied by a down-regulation of attention to internal thoughts, and vice-versa. In contrast, we often divide our attention between the external environment and internal thoughts to pursue distinct goals, yet virtually no prior research has examined how brain networks support this functionally critical neurocognitive process. In the current study, participants planned their responses for an upcoming alternate uses divergent thinking task (AUT-Condition), indicated whether arrows were pointing left or right (Arrows-Condition) or performed both tasks simultaneously (Dual-Task condition). Behaviorally, the Dual-Task condition was associated with equivalent generation of alternate uses but increased RT variability compared to the single-task conditions. Static connectivity analyses indicated that FPCN and SN increased their connectivity to DMN and reduced their connectivity to DAN during the Dual-Task condition and the AUT-Condition compared to the Arrows-Condition. Furthermore, DAN-SN connectivity was highest during the Arrows-Condition, intermediate during the Dual-Task condition and lowest during the AUT-Condition. Finally, time-varying connectivity analyses indicated that individuals who reported spending less time thinking of alternate uses during the Dual-Task condition spent more time in a state associated with performing the Arrows-Condition. Overall, our results suggest that interactions between DMN, FPCN, SN and DAN allow internal-external dual-tasking, and that time-varying functional connectivity between these networks is sensitive to attentional fluctuations between tasks during dual-tasking.

摘要

先前的研究表明,默认模式网络(DMN)和背侧注意网络(DAN)分别通过与突显网络(SN)和额顶网络(FPCN)的相互作用,参与到内源性注意和外源性注意中。执行需要外部注意的任务通常伴随着对内部思维注意力的下调,反之亦然。相比之下,我们经常在外部环境和内部思维之间分配注意力,以追求不同的目标,但实际上几乎没有先前的研究探讨过大脑网络如何支持这种功能关键的神经认知过程。在当前的研究中,参与者为即将到来的替代用途发散思维任务(AUT 条件)规划他们的反应,指示箭头是指向左还是右(箭头条件),或者同时执行两个任务(双重任务条件)。行为上,与单一任务条件相比,双重任务条件与等效的替代用途生成相关,但反应时变异性增加。静态连通性分析表明,与箭头条件相比,在双重任务条件和 AUT 条件下,FPCN 和 SN 增加了与 DMN 的连通性,减少了与 DAN 的连通性。此外,在箭头条件下 DAN-SN 连通性最高,在双重任务条件下居中,在 AUT 条件下最低。最后,时变连通性分析表明,在双重任务条件下报告花更少时间思考替代用途的个体在执行箭头条件时花更多时间处于一种状态。总体而言,我们的结果表明,DMN、FPCN、SN 和 DAN 之间的相互作用允许内部-外部双重任务处理,并且这些网络之间的时变功能连通性对双重任务处理期间任务之间注意力的波动敏感。

相似文献

3
Functional connectivity within and between intrinsic brain networks correlates with trait mind wandering.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Aug;103:140-153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
5
Thinking about thinking: Neural mechanisms and effects on memory.
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 15;127:203-214. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.067. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
6
An fMRI investigation of the relationship between future imagination and cognitive flexibility.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 27;95:156-172. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
Time-varying functional connectivity predicts fluctuations in sustained attention in a serial tapping task.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Feb;24(1):111-125. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01156-1. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
8
Effects of task complexity and age-differences on task-related functional connectivity of attentional networks.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jun;114:50-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Task-positive Functional Connectivity of the Default Mode Network Transcends Task Domain.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Dec;27(12):2369-81. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00859. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic brain states underlying advanced concentrative absorption meditation: A 7-T fMRI-intensive case study.
Netw Neurosci. 2025 Mar 3;9(1):125-145. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00432. eCollection 2025.
4
Dynamic Functional Connectivity Correlates of Trait Mindfulness in Early Adolescence.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024 Jul 23;4(6):100367. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100367. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Dynamic functional connectivity correlates of trait mindfulness in early adolescence.
bioRxiv. 2024 Jul 4:2024.07.01.601544. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.01.601544.
7
Investigating the heterogeneity within the somatosensory-motor network and its relationship with the attention and default systems.
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Aug 23;2(9):pgad276. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad276. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Impacts of urban green infrastructure on attentional functioning: insights from an fMRI study.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1047993. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1047993. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Spontaneous cognitive processes and the behavioral validation of time-varying brain connectivity.
Netw Neurosci. 2018 Oct 1;2(4):397-417. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00037. eCollection 2018.
2
Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI.
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Sep 1;28(9):3095-3114. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx179.
3
States of Mind: Characterizing the Neural Bases of Focus and Mind-wandering through Dynamic Functional Connectivity.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Mar;29(3):495-506. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01066. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
On the Stability of BOLD fMRI Correlations.
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Oct 1;27(10):4719-4732. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw265.
5
Spontaneous eyelid closures link vigilance fluctuation with fMRI dynamic connectivity states.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 23;113(34):9653-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523980113. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
6
Central as well as Peripheral Attentional Bottlenecks in Dual-Task Performance Activate Lateral Prefrontal Cortices.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 16;10:119. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00119. eCollection 2016.
8
Dynamic Brain Network Correlates of Spontaneous Fluctuations in Attention.
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Mar 1;27(3):1831-1840. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw029.
9
Dynamic coupling of complex brain networks and dual-task behavior.
Neuroimage. 2016 Apr 1;129:233-246. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.028. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Feb;20(2):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验