Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, University of Toronto, 3560 Bathurst St, North York, ON, M6A 2E1, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 140 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16801, USA.
Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 15;197:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.054. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
Previous research suggests that default-mode network (DMN) and dorsal attention network (DAN) are involved in internally- and externally-directed attention, respectively, through interactions with salience network (SN) and frontoparietal network (FPCN). Performing a task requiring external attention is often accompanied by a down-regulation of attention to internal thoughts, and vice-versa. In contrast, we often divide our attention between the external environment and internal thoughts to pursue distinct goals, yet virtually no prior research has examined how brain networks support this functionally critical neurocognitive process. In the current study, participants planned their responses for an upcoming alternate uses divergent thinking task (AUT-Condition), indicated whether arrows were pointing left or right (Arrows-Condition) or performed both tasks simultaneously (Dual-Task condition). Behaviorally, the Dual-Task condition was associated with equivalent generation of alternate uses but increased RT variability compared to the single-task conditions. Static connectivity analyses indicated that FPCN and SN increased their connectivity to DMN and reduced their connectivity to DAN during the Dual-Task condition and the AUT-Condition compared to the Arrows-Condition. Furthermore, DAN-SN connectivity was highest during the Arrows-Condition, intermediate during the Dual-Task condition and lowest during the AUT-Condition. Finally, time-varying connectivity analyses indicated that individuals who reported spending less time thinking of alternate uses during the Dual-Task condition spent more time in a state associated with performing the Arrows-Condition. Overall, our results suggest that interactions between DMN, FPCN, SN and DAN allow internal-external dual-tasking, and that time-varying functional connectivity between these networks is sensitive to attentional fluctuations between tasks during dual-tasking.
先前的研究表明,默认模式网络(DMN)和背侧注意网络(DAN)分别通过与突显网络(SN)和额顶网络(FPCN)的相互作用,参与到内源性注意和外源性注意中。执行需要外部注意的任务通常伴随着对内部思维注意力的下调,反之亦然。相比之下,我们经常在外部环境和内部思维之间分配注意力,以追求不同的目标,但实际上几乎没有先前的研究探讨过大脑网络如何支持这种功能关键的神经认知过程。在当前的研究中,参与者为即将到来的替代用途发散思维任务(AUT 条件)规划他们的反应,指示箭头是指向左还是右(箭头条件),或者同时执行两个任务(双重任务条件)。行为上,与单一任务条件相比,双重任务条件与等效的替代用途生成相关,但反应时变异性增加。静态连通性分析表明,与箭头条件相比,在双重任务条件和 AUT 条件下,FPCN 和 SN 增加了与 DMN 的连通性,减少了与 DAN 的连通性。此外,在箭头条件下 DAN-SN 连通性最高,在双重任务条件下居中,在 AUT 条件下最低。最后,时变连通性分析表明,在双重任务条件下报告花更少时间思考替代用途的个体在执行箭头条件时花更多时间处于一种状态。总体而言,我们的结果表明,DMN、FPCN、SN 和 DAN 之间的相互作用允许内部-外部双重任务处理,并且这些网络之间的时变功能连通性对双重任务处理期间任务之间注意力的波动敏感。