School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Victoria, Australia; State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.
School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Victoria, Australia.
Chemosphere. 2019 Aug;228:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.114. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
Biomonitoring microplastics in freshwater ecosystems has been insufficient in comparison with its practice in marine environments. It is an important first step to understand microplastic uptake in organisms when assessing risk in natural freshwater habitats. We conducted microplastic biomonitoring within the Greater Melbourne Area; where the microplastic baseline pollution in freshwater organisms was largely unknown. A common noxious fish species, Gambusia holbrooki, was targeted. Individuals (n = 180) from nine wetlands were analyzed. Uptake pathway, size, weight and gender were examined in relation to microplastic uptake in the body (presumed uptake via gut) and head (presumed uptake via gills). On average, 19.4% of fish had microplastics present in their bodies with an abundance of 0.6 items per individual (items/ind) and 7.2% of fish had microplastics in their heads with an abundance of 0.1 items/ind. Polyester was the dominant plastic type and fibers were the most common shape. The amount of microplastics in Gambusia holbrooki in current study is relatively low in a global comparison. The bodies of fish contained more microplastics on average than heads, and the size of microplastics detected in heads were smaller than those found in bodies. Microplastic uptake was directly proportional to size and weight. Furthermore, female individuals showed a tendency to ingest more microplastics than males. Laboratory experiments under controlled conditions are suggested to further explore such relationships. Our findings are important to understanding the potential ecological risks posed by microplastics to organisms in freshwater environments and provide suitable methodologies to conduct biomonitoring in future investigations.
与在海洋环境中的实践相比,淡水生态系统中的生物监测微塑料的工作还很不足。当评估自然淡水生境中的风险时,了解生物体中微塑料的摄取是重要的第一步。我们在大墨尔本地区进行了微塑料生物监测;在那里,淡水生物中的微塑料基线污染在很大程度上是未知的。我们选择了一种常见的有毒鱼类,大口黑鲈作为目标。分析了来自九个湿地的 180 个个体。研究了微塑料的摄取途径、大小、体重和性别与体内(推测通过肠道摄取)和头部(推测通过鳃摄取)的微塑料摄取之间的关系。平均而言,19.4%的鱼体内有微塑料,每个个体的丰度为 0.6 个(个/个体),7.2%的鱼头部有微塑料,丰度为 0.1 个/个体。聚酯是主要的塑料类型,纤维是最常见的形状。与全球比较,当前研究中大口黑鲈体内的微塑料数量相对较低。鱼体平均比头部含有更多的微塑料,而且头部检测到的微塑料尺寸小于体部。微塑料的摄取与大小和体重成正比。此外,雌性个体比雄性个体更倾向于摄取更多的微塑料。建议在受控条件下进行实验室实验,以进一步探索这种关系。我们的发现对于了解微塑料对淡水环境中生物的潜在生态风险具有重要意义,并为未来的调查提供了进行生物监测的合适方法。