Suppr超能文献

循环肿瘤细胞和ctDNA对肺癌基因突变的诊断价值。

The diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells and ctDNA for gene mutations in lung cancer.

作者信息

Lyu Mengyuan, Zhou Jian, Ning Kang, Ying Binwu

机构信息

West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China,

出版信息

Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Apr 5;12:2539-2552. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S195342. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Detecting gene mutations by two competing biomarkers, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and ctDNA has gradually paved a new diagnostic avenue for personalized medicine. We performed a comprehensive analysis to compare the diagnostic value of CTCs and ctDNA for gene mutations in lung cancer.

METHODS

Publications were electronically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science as of July 2018. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC, each with a 95% CI, were yielded. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Quality assessment of included studies was also performed.

RESULTS

From 4,283 candidate articles, we identified 47 articles with a total of 7,244 patients for qualitative review and meta-analysis. When detecting , the CTC and ctDNA groups had pooled sensitivity of 75.4% (95% CI 0.683-0.817) and 67.1% (95% CI 0.647-0.695), respectively. When testing , pooled sensitivity was 38.7% (95% CI 0.266-0.519) in the CTC group and 65.1% (95% CI 0.558-0.736) in the ctDNA group. The diagnostic performance of ctDNA in testing and was also evaluated. Heterogeneity among the 47 articles was acceptable.

CONCLUSION

ctDNA might be a more promising biomarker with equivalent performance to CTCs when detecting and its detailed subtypes, and superior diagnostic capacity when testing and . In addition, the diagnostic performance of ctDNA and CTCs depends on the detection methods greatly, and this warrants further studies to explore more sensitive methods.

摘要

目的

通过两种相互竞争的生物标志物——循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)和循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)来检测基因突变,已逐渐为个性化医疗开辟了一条新的诊断途径。我们进行了一项综合分析,以比较CTC和ctDNA对肺癌基因突变的诊断价值。

方法

截至2018年7月,通过电子检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库中的文献。得出合并敏感度、特异度和AUC及其95%置信区间。进行亚组分析和敏感度分析。同时对纳入研究进行质量评估。

结果

从4283篇候选文章中,我们筛选出47篇文章,共7244例患者进行定性综述和荟萃分析。检测 时,CTC组和ctDNA组的合并敏感度分别为75.4%(95%CI 0.683 - 0.817)和67.1%(95%CI 0.647 - 0.695)。检测 时,CTC组的合并敏感度为38.7%(95%CI 0.266 - 0.519),ctDNA组为65.1%(95%CI 0.558 - 0.736)。还评估了ctDNA在检测 和 方面的诊断性能。47篇文章之间的异质性可接受。

结论

在检测 及其详细亚型时,ctDNA可能是一种更有前景的生物标志物,其性能与CTC相当,而在检测 和 时具有更高的诊断能力。此外,ctDNA和CTC的诊断性能在很大程度上取决于检测方法,这值得进一步研究以探索更敏感的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8181/6454989/58faf094e14c/ott-12-2539Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验