Montone Rocco A, Niccoli Giampaolo, Tufaro Vincenzo, Minelli Silvia, Russo Michele, Vergni Federico, Sommariva Luigi, Pelliccia Francesco, Bedogni Francesco, Crea Filippo
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Interventional Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(1):59-67. doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.83772. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have a slower decline in renal function than those taking warfarin. Moreover, a warfarin-related nephropathy has been described.
We assessed variation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and occurrence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with AF taking warfarin compared with NOAC.
We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients taking oral anticoagulation for AF undergoing PCI. The primary endpoint was variation in eGFR and serum creatinine levels within 48-72 h after PCI. The secondary endpoint was occurrence of CIN, defined as a ≥ 25% relative increase, or a ≥ 0.5 mg/dl absolute increase, in serum creatinine levels within 48-72 h.
We enrolled 420 patients (mean age: 75.0 ±5.5 years, 272 (64.7%) male), 124 (29.5%) treated with NOAC and 296 (70.5%) with warfarin. NOAC patients showed a reduced decline in renal function (eGFR change: -2.8 ±7.9 ml/min/1.73 m vs. -4.5 ±6.5 ml/min/1.73 m, respectively, = 0.02) and a smaller increase in serum creatinine levels (0.026 ±0.112 vs. 0.055 ±0.132, = 0.032) after PCI compared with warfarin. In the multivariate linear regression model independent predictors of eGFR changes were diabetes, baseline eGFR ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m and warfarin use. Occurrence of CIN did not differ between NOAC and warfarin patients (13 (10.5%) vs. 46 (15.5%), = 0.22).
Patients with AF taking NOAC have a reduced decline in renal function after PCI compared with warfarin. The NOAC may be a reasonable option for patients with a high risk of developing CIN.
接受非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOAC)治疗的心房颤动(AF)患者肾功能下降速度比服用华法林的患者慢。此外,还描述了一种与华法林相关的肾病。
我们评估了服用华法林与NOAC的AF患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的变化以及造影剂肾病(CIN)的发生情况。
我们回顾性纳入了连续接受口服抗凝剂治疗且因AF接受PCI的患者。主要终点是PCI后48 - 72小时内eGFR和血清肌酐水平的变化。次要终点是CIN的发生,定义为48 - 72小时内血清肌酐水平相对升高≥25%或绝对升高≥0.5mg/dl。
我们纳入了420例患者(平均年龄:75.0±5.5岁,272例(64.7%)为男性),其中124例(29.5%)接受NOAC治疗,296例(70.5%)接受华法林治疗。与华法林相比,接受NOAC治疗的患者PCI后肾功能下降幅度较小(eGFR变化:分别为-2.8±7.9ml/min/1.73m²与-4.5±6.5ml/min/1.73m²,P = 0.02),血清肌酐水平升高幅度较小(0.026±0.112与0.055±0.132,P = 0.032)。在多变量线性回归模型中,eGFR变化的独立预测因素为糖尿病、基线eGFR≤60ml/min/1.73m²以及使用华法林。NOAC组和华法林组患者CIN的发生率无差异(13例(10.5%)与46例(15.5%),P = 0.22)。
与华法林相比,服用NOAC的AF患者PCI后肾功能下降幅度较小。对于发生CIN风险较高的患者,NOAC可能是一个合理的选择。