Soil Sciences Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Soil Sciences Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia; Faculty of Agriculture, Nile Valley University, River Nile State, Sudan.
Environ Res. 2019 Jul;174:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
Carbon dioxide is the primary greenhouse gas that has a strong impact on global warming. Several technologies have been developed for capturing CO to mitigate the greenhouse effect. The objective of this research was to investigate the performance of several sorbents based on dry water and porous carbon materials for capturing CO. Seven sorbents were prepared and comparatively evaluated for their CO capture capabilities: (i) Conocarpus biochar (CBC); (ii) commercial activated carbon (CAC); (iii) normal dry water (NDW); (iv) KCO-treated CBC (TCBC); (v) KCO-modified dry water (MDW); (vi) MDW and 2% TCBC (MDWTCBC); and (vii) MDW and 2% activated carbon (MDWCAC). The sorption process was carried out with initial CO concentration of 5.7%, temperature of 25 °C, feed gas flow rate of 0.5 l min and a pressure of 1.0 bar. The pure CO was mixed with O or N to achieve the desired inlet concentration of CO. The CO adsorption capacity and partition coefficient (PC) of the tested sorbents were evaluated at 5% and 100% breakthrough (BT). The results showed a longer breakthrough and equilibrium adsorption times for CO when mixed with N than with O. Among all sorbents, both CAC and CBC showed enhanced CO capture performance with equilibrium (100% BT) adsorption capacities of 239 and 197 mg g, respectively (in terms of PC: 1.0 × 10 and 7.9 × 10 mol kg Pa, respectively). In contrast, the performance of TCBC and the dry water-based sorbents was far lower than CAC or CBC. The CO adsorption data fitted well to the non-linearized form of the pseudo-first-order kinetic model. The Fourier-transform infrared spectral patterns indicated that the reaction of CO molecules with the hydroxyl groups of sorbents is possible through the formation of chemisorbed CO species. It could be concluded that the activation process did not play a role in increasing the CO capture performance in order to form new active sorption sites. However, Conocarpus biochar can be used as efficient sorbent for CO capture with a better performance than other materials tested previously (e.g., activated carbon).
二氧化碳是对全球变暖影响最大的主要温室气体。已经开发出几种技术来捕获 CO 以减轻温室效应。本研究的目的是研究基于干水和多孔碳材料的几种吸附剂对 CO 的捕集性能。制备了七种吸附剂,并对其 CO 捕集能力进行了比较评价:(i)罗望子生物炭(CBC);(ii)商业活性炭(CAC);(iii)普通干水(NDW);(iv)KCO 处理的 CBC(TCBC);(v)KCO 改性干水(MDW);(vi)MDW 和 2%TCBC(MDWTCBC);和(vii)MDW 和 2%活性炭(MDWCAC)。在初始 CO 浓度为 5.7%、温度为 25°C、进气流量为 0.5 l/min 和压力为 1.0 bar 的条件下进行吸附过程。将纯 CO 与 O 或 N 混合以达到所需的 CO 入口浓度。在 5%和 100%穿透(BT)时,评价了测试吸附剂的 CO 吸附容量和分配系数(PC)。结果表明,当 CO 与 N 混合时,CO 的穿透和平衡吸附时间比与 O 混合时更长。在所有吸附剂中,CAC 和 CBC 均表现出增强的 CO 捕集性能,平衡(100% BT)吸附容量分别为 239 和 197 mg/g(按 PC 计:1.0×10 和 7.9×10 mol kg Pa)。相比之下,TCBC 和基于干水的吸附剂的性能远低于 CAC 或 CBC。CO 吸附数据与非线性拟一级动力学模型拟合良好。傅里叶变换红外光谱图谱表明,CO 分子与吸附剂的羟基之间的反应可以通过形成化学吸附的 CO 物种来进行。可以得出结论,为了形成新的活性吸附位,激活过程并未在提高 CO 捕集性能方面发挥作用。然而,罗望子生物炭可用作 CO 捕集的有效吸附剂,其性能优于以前测试过的其他材料(例如活性炭)。