School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, California.
School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Apr;83(3):6582. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6582.
To identify common practices for measuring quality of experiential education (EE) programs at US schools and colleges of pharmacy. In-depth, semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with directors of experiential education or their equivalent, to identify elements of quality assurance (QA) processes for EE. To ensure representativeness from all fully accredited programs, purposeful sampling was used for participant solicitation and enrollment until both code and meaning saturation were reached. Participants were asked questions in six domain areas (preceptor and student performance, site quality, role of site visits, coursework, and achievement of learning outcomes). An iterative data coding and analysis process identified themes and notable practices within each domain area. Interviews were conducted with representatives of 29 programs. All participants reported evaluating preceptor performance. Fewer participants identified a deliberate site assessment process, with most equating preceptor and site evaluation. Participants conducted site visits primarily to assess site quality and maintain relationships with preceptors. Few participants were able to provide details of a process used for evaluating experiential education coursework and student outcomes. All participants used student performance assessments to measure the quality of student performance. Overall, participants almost universally reported collecting data, less frequently described processes for data evaluation, and rarely shared outcomes arising from data collection and analysis. Themes and notable practices identified in this study provide initial benchmarks for QA programs for EE and will inform content and metrics of subsequent follow-up studies. A six-step process for QA for EE is proposed.
为了确定美国药学院校体验式教育(EE)项目的常见衡量标准。对体验式教育负责人或其同等职位的人员进行了深入的半结构化电话访谈,以确定 EE 质量保证(QA)流程的要素。为了确保所有完全认可的项目具有代表性,采用有目的抽样来征求和招募参与者,直到达到代码和含义的饱和度。参与者被问到六个领域的问题(导师和学生的表现、实习地点的质量、实习地点访问的作用、课程和学习成果的实现)。迭代的数据编码和分析过程确定了每个领域的主题和显著做法。对 29 个项目的代表进行了访谈。所有参与者都报告了评估导师表现的情况。较少的参与者确定了一个深思熟虑的站点评估过程,大多数人将导师和站点评估等同起来。参与者主要进行现场访问,以评估现场质量并与导师保持关系。很少有参与者能够详细说明用于评估体验式教育课程和学生成果的过程。所有参与者都使用学生表现评估来衡量学生表现的质量。总体而言,参与者几乎普遍报告收集数据,较少描述数据评估过程,很少分享数据收集和分析产生的结果。本研究中确定的主题和显著做法为 EE 的 QA 计划提供了初步基准,并将为后续后续研究的内容和指标提供信息。提出了一个用于 EE 的 QA 的六步流程。