Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Aug;58(2):244-251.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.032. Epub 2019 May 7.
Little is known about how to prepare older patients for advance care planning (ACP) discussions in primary care.
The objective of the study was to explore older patients' perspectives and experiences on ACP discussions with family members and/or primary care clinicians.
We conducted a qualitative interview study with 20 older patients who were involved in the clinic's ACP quality improvement initiative. We used an inductive approach to generate a coding scheme and used thematic analysis alongside a constant comparative methodology to iteratively refine emergent themes after coding the data. We used the transtheoretical behavior change model to conceptualize the process of ACP discussions, focusing on the contemplation, preparation, and action stages.
Four key themes emerged from our analyses: 1) the relevance/importance of ACP as a whole; 2) independently conceptualizing wishes and preferences for the future; 3) the process of engagement in ACP discussions; and 4) different outcomes of ACP discussions. While patients contemplated having an ACP discussion, they needed time to conceptualize their wishes on their own before documenting wishes or engaging with others. Moving to the preparation stage, patients shared their perspectives about how to engage family members and primary care clinicians in ACP discussions and reported different outcomes of these discussions, which varied according to patients' goals for ACP.
Understanding how to best prepare patients for ACP discussions from patients enrolled in an ACP primary clinic quality improvement initiative may assist primary care practices in developing interventions to improve the occurrence and effectiveness of such discussions.
对于如何在初级保健中为老年患者准备预先护理计划(ACP)讨论,人们知之甚少。
本研究的目的是探讨老年患者对与家庭成员和/或初级保健临床医生进行 ACP 讨论的看法和经验。
我们对 20 名参与诊所 ACP 质量改进计划的老年患者进行了定性访谈研究。我们采用归纳法生成编码方案,并使用主题分析和恒定性比较方法,在对数据进行编码后,迭代细化新兴主题。我们使用跨理论行为改变模型来概念化 ACP 讨论的过程,重点关注思考、准备和行动阶段。
我们的分析得出了四个关键主题:1)ACP 作为一个整体的相关性/重要性;2)独立地构思对未来的愿望和偏好;3)参与 ACP 讨论的过程;4)ACP 讨论的不同结果。虽然患者考虑进行 ACP 讨论,但他们需要时间自行构思自己的愿望,然后再记录愿望或与他人进行交流。进入准备阶段后,患者分享了他们对如何让家庭成员和初级保健临床医生参与 ACP 讨论的看法,并报告了这些讨论的不同结果,这些结果因患者对 ACP 的目标而异。
了解如何从参与 ACP 初级诊所质量改进计划的患者中最好地为 ACP 讨论做好准备,可能有助于初级保健实践制定干预措施,以提高此类讨论的发生和效果。