Suppr超能文献

电子烟使用对心血管的影响。

Cardiovascular impact of electronic-cigarette use.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, A2-237 CHS, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90025, United States.

出版信息

Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Apr;30(3):133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Abstract

The majority of premature deaths related to tobacco cigarettes (TCs) are attributable to cardiovascular disease, so it is fitting and timely to review the overall cardiovascular impact of electronic cigarettes (ECs), which have recently exploded onto the tobacco product market. Longitudinal studies of EC users are necessary, but not yet available, to answer the question whether cardiovascular disease is lower in chronic EC users compared to TC smokers, so we must rely on biomarker studies. Several biomarkers that portend increased cardiovascular risk, including markers of increased sympathetic nerve activity, oxidative stress and inflammation, vascular dysfunction, and thrombosis, have been reported to be abnormal after EC use, although often not to the degree found in TC smokers. We conclude that if all FDA-certified strategies for TC smoking cessation have been tried without success, then ECs may be a reasonable strategy for TC smoking cessation, but the message to non-TC smokers must be clear and unwavering: non TC-smokers should not use ECs - they are not harmless.

摘要

大多数与香烟相关的过早死亡归因于心血管疾病,因此,对最近涌入烟草产品市场的电子烟的整体心血管影响进行审查是恰当且及时的。为了回答慢性电子烟使用者的心血管疾病发病率是否低于香烟吸烟者的问题,需要进行电子烟使用者的纵向研究,但这些研究尚未开展,因此我们必须依赖生物标志物研究。已经报道了一些预示心血管风险增加的生物标志物,包括交感神经活动增加的标志物、氧化应激和炎症、血管功能障碍和血栓形成,这些标志物在电子烟使用后异常,但通常不如香烟吸烟者那样严重。我们的结论是,如果所有美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的香烟戒烟策略都没有成功,那么电子烟可能是香烟戒烟的合理策略,但必须向非香烟吸烟者传达明确而坚定的信息:非香烟吸烟者不应使用电子烟——它们并非无害。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验