Department of Surgery, Hospital Center Biel/Bienne, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland.
J Perioper Pract. 2020 Mar;30(3):57-62. doi: 10.1177/1750458919850403. Epub 2019 May 13.
To compare the compliance of the Surgical Safety Checklist in two groups of users: early (Group A) and late (Group B) adopters, and to detect change over time.
Observational study. We collected all Surgical Safety Checklist protocols in one calendar month period and, eight months later, we repeated collection for another month. Analysis was then performed to compare the compliance in different groups and over time.
There was no statistical difference in the overall compliance between the two groups or between elective and emergency cases. Equally, there was no significant change in compliance over time in Group A. In Group B, however, there was a trend to an improved compliance over time. Compliance to the Surgical Safety Checklist was significantly lower during operations performed by consulting surgeons in comparison to internally employed surgeons.
比较两组使用者(早期采用者组 A 和晚期采用者组 B)对手术安全检查表的依从性,并检测随时间的变化。
观察性研究。我们在一个日历月内收集了所有手术安全检查表的方案,并在八个月后再次收集了一个月的方案。然后进行分析,以比较不同组和随时间的依从性。
两组之间或择期和急诊病例之间的总体依从性没有统计学差异。同样,组 A 随时间的依从性也没有明显变化。然而,在组 B 中,随时间的依从性有改善的趋势。与内部雇用的外科医生相比,顾问外科医生进行的手术中手术安全检查表的依从性明显较低。