Suppr超能文献

参与者参与对韵律突出性的影响。

Effects of Participant Engagement on Prosodic Prominence.

作者信息

Buxó-Lugo Andrés, Toscano Joseph C, Watson Duane G

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Beckman InstituteUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.

Department of Psychology, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Discourse Process. 2018;55(3):305-323. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1240742. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

Abstract

It is generally assumed that prosodic cues that provide linguistic information, like discourse status, are driven primarily by the information structure of the conversation. This article investigates whether speakers have the capacity to adjust subtle acoustic-phonetic properties of the prosodic signal when they find themselves in contexts in which accurate communication is important. Thus, we examine whether the communicative context, in addition to discourse structure, modulates prosodic choices when speakers produce acoustic prominence. We manipulated the discourse status of target words in the context of a highly communicative task (i.e., working with a partner to solve puzzles in the computer game Minecraft) and in the context of a less communicative task more typical of psycholinguistic experiments (i.e., picture description). Speakers in the more communicative task produced prosodic cues to discourse structure that were more discriminable than those in the less communicative task. In a second experiment, we found that the presence or absence of a conversational partner drove some, but not all, of these effects. Together, these results suggest that speakers can modulate the prosodic signal in response to the communicative and social context.

摘要

一般认为,提供语言信息(如话语状态)的韵律线索主要由对话的信息结构驱动。本文研究了说话者在发现自己处于准确交流很重要的情境中时,是否有能力调整韵律信号的细微声学语音特性。因此,我们研究了除话语结构外,交际语境在说话者产生声学重音时是否会调节韵律选择。我们在高度交际任务(即与伙伴合作解决电脑游戏《我的世界》中的谜题)和心理语言学实验中更典型的交际性较弱的任务(即图片描述)的背景下,操纵目标词的话语状态。在更具交际性的任务中的说话者产生的话语结构韵律线索比在交际性较弱的任务中的说话者产生的更具辨别力。在第二个实验中,我们发现对话伙伴的存在与否会引发部分但并非全部这些效应。综合来看,这些结果表明说话者可以根据交际和社会语境调节韵律信号。

相似文献

1
Effects of Participant Engagement on Prosodic Prominence.
Discourse Process. 2018;55(3):305-323. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1240742. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
2
Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Jan 1;30(1-2):149-166. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.862285.
3
Reduction in Prosodic Prominence Predicts Speakers' Recall: Implications for Theories of Prosody.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May 28;30(5):606-619. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.966122. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
5
Contrast-marking prosodic emphasis in Williams syndrome: results of detailed phonetic analysis.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jan;52(1):46-58. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12250. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
6
How do autistic adults use syntactic and prosodic cues to manage spoken discourse?
Clin Linguist Phon. 2021 Dec 2;35(12):1184-1209. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2021.1878278. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Beat gestures help preschoolers recall and comprehend discourse information.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Aug;172:168-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
8
The Relationship between Prosodic Ability and Conversational Prosodic Entrainment.
Speech Prosody. 2020 May;2020:769-773. doi: 10.21437/speechprosody.2020-157.
10
The semantics of prosody: acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning.
Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;33(1):127-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01007.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Marking prosodic prominence for voice assistant and human addressees.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jun;51(6):986-1003. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001396. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Speakers are more cooperative and less individual when interacting in larger group sizes.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 5;14:1145572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145572. eCollection 2023.
3
How games can make behavioural science better.
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7944):433-436. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00065-6.
5
The scope of audience design in child-directed speech: Parents' tailoring of word lengths for adult versus child listeners.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Nov;46(11):2163-2178. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000939. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
All P's or mixed vegetables?
Front Psychol. 2013 May 8;4:234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00234. eCollection 2013.
2
Production preferences cannot be understood without reference to communication.
Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 26;4:230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00230. eCollection 2013.
3
How language production shapes language form and comprehension.
Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 26;4:226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226. eCollection 2013.
4
Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):699-707. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0262-6.
5
Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.
Lang Cogn Process. 2010 Jan 1;25(7-9):905-945. doi: 10.1080/01690961003589492.
7
Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence.
Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):1137-46. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1137.
8
Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density.
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Aug;61(1):23-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002.
9
Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.
J Mem Lang. 2009 Aug 1;61(2):171-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.003.
10
Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):1038-54. doi: 10.1121/1.1923349.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验