Chongqing Engineering Laboratory of Digital Medical Equipment and Systems, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China.
Chongqing Engineering Laboratory of Digital Medical Equipment and Systems, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Jul;175:53-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
With the acceleration of social rhythm and the increase of pressure, there are various sleep problems among people. Sleep staging is an important basis for the diagnosis of sleep disorders and other related diseases. The process of automatic staging of sleep is mainly divided into three core steps: data preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification. Accurate analysis of the features of sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) signals is not only helpful to improve the accuracy of sleep staging, but also help people to understand their sleep status.
This paper focuses on the analysis of EEG features during sleep staging, and reviews many feature extraction methods and classification methods for sleep staging and sums up these algorithms used in literatures and its staging results. Besides, this paper lists a total of 22 features based on time domain, time-frequency, and nonlinear analysis methods, including kurtosis, skewness, Hjorth parameters, and standard deviations, wavelets energy; sample entropy (SampEn), fuzzy entropy, Tsallis entropy, fractal dimension (FD), complexity. The data set comes from EDF database. Wavelet transform (WT) and support vector machine (SVM) are used to achieve the sleep staging based on single-channel EEG signal. And the characteristic feature data was analyzed by ANOVA.
By comparison, the SampEn, fuzzy entropy, FD and complexity can achieve ideal sleep staging. The highest accuracy of sleep staging is 85.93%. The FD and complexity are simpler than the entropy value, but their accuracies are lower. Furthermore, the distribution of these methods in different sleep period is more significant than others, which is content with the results of sleep staging.
In a word, due to the non-stationary and non-linear characteristics of EEG signals, time domain and time-frequency analysis methods all have some limitations. Nonlinear analysis was more effective and practical for the analysis of sleep EEG.
随着社会节奏的加快和压力的增加,人们存在各种睡眠问题。睡眠分期是诊断睡眠障碍和其他相关疾病的重要依据。睡眠自动分期的过程主要分为三个核心步骤:数据预处理、特征提取和分类。准确分析睡眠脑电图(EEG)信号的特征不仅有助于提高睡眠分期的准确性,还有助于人们了解自己的睡眠状态。
本文主要关注睡眠分期的 EEG 特征分析,综述了许多用于睡眠分期的特征提取方法和分类方法,并总结了这些算法在文献中的应用及其分期结果。此外,本文共列出了基于时域、时频和非线性分析方法的 22 种特征,包括峰度、偏度、Hjorth 参数和标准差、小波能量;样本熵(SampEn)、模糊熵、Tsallis 熵、分形维数(FD)、复杂度。数据集来自 EDF 数据库。使用小波变换(WT)和支持向量机(SVM)基于单通道 EEG 信号实现睡眠分期,并通过 ANOVA 对特征数据进行分析。
通过比较,SampEn、模糊熵、FD 和复杂度可以实现理想的睡眠分期。睡眠分期的最高准确率为 85.93%。FD 和复杂度比熵值更简单,但它们的准确率较低。此外,这些方法在不同睡眠期的分布比其他方法更为显著,这与睡眠分期的结果一致。
总之,由于 EEG 信号的非平稳性和非线性特征,时域和时频分析方法都存在一些局限性。非线性分析对于睡眠 EEG 的分析更有效和实用。