Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):555-563. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.007.
There has been increasing focus on both patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) collection and patient satisfaction ratings; nevertheless, little is known about their relationship.
To determine the association between patient experience with PROM collection and visit satisfaction and to identify characteristics of better ratings for each.
This cross-sectional observational study included all patients seen in 15 neurological clinics who completed PROMs as well as 6 questions on the patient experience with PROMs at least once from October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016. Visit satisfaction was evaluated using a composite measure of physician communication, overall physician rating, and the likelihood of recommending that physician as indicated on the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. Predictors of PROM experience and satisfaction were identified using proportional odds and logistic regression models, respectively.
There were 6454 patients (average age 58 ± 15 years, 59% women) who completed PROMs and responded to the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. There were significant positive associations between each PROM experience question and visit satisfaction (r = 0.11-0.19; P<.010), although factors predicting visit satisfaction differed from those predicting PROM experience. A differential effect of PROMs on visit satisfaction was identified for patients who were nonwhite, had lower income, and had more comorbidities.
Although there was a significant association between better PROM experience and higher visit satisfaction, relationships with clinical characteristics differed, providing insights into how PROMs may be associated with patients' visit satisfaction. Further research is necessary to confirm whether PROMs can be used to improve visit satisfaction, particularly in patients who historically have reported lower quality of care.
人们越来越关注患者报告的结果测量(PROM)的收集和患者满意度评分,但对于两者之间的关系却知之甚少。
确定患者对 PROM 收集的体验与就诊满意度之间的关系,并确定每个方面更好评分的特征。
这项横断面观察性研究纳入了自 2015 年 10 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间,在 15 个神经科诊所就诊并至少完成过一次 PROM 以及对 PROM 收集体验的 6 个问题的所有患者。就诊满意度通过医师沟通、总体医师评分以及 Clinician 和 Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems 调查中患者对医师的推荐意愿的综合指标来评估。使用比例优势和逻辑回归模型分别确定 PROM 体验和满意度的预测因素。
共有 6454 例患者(平均年龄 58 ± 15 岁,59%为女性)完成了 PROM 并对 Clinician 和 Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems 调查做出了回应。每个 PROM 体验问题与就诊满意度之间均存在显著的正相关关系(r=0.11-0.19;P<.010),尽管预测就诊满意度的因素与预测 PROM 体验的因素不同。对于非白人、收入较低和合并症较多的患者,PROM 对就诊满意度的影响存在差异。
尽管 PROM 体验更好与就诊满意度更高之间存在显著关联,但与临床特征的关系不同,这为了解 PROM 如何与患者就诊满意度相关提供了思路。需要进一步研究以确认 PROM 是否可用于提高就诊满意度,特别是在那些历史上报告护理质量较低的患者中。