Kersten Christian, Cameron Marte G, Bailey Andrew G, Fallon Marie T, Laird Barry J, Paterson Vicki, Mitchell Rory, Fleetwood-Walker Sue M, Daly Fergus, Mjåland Svein
Sørlandet Hospital, Center for Cancer Treatment, Kristiansand, Norway.
Frontier Science (Scotland) Ltd, Kingussie, Scotland.
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):2495-2505. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz101.
Case reports and a case series have described relief of neuropathic pain (NP) after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-Is). These observations are supported by preclinical findings. The aim of this trial was to explore a potential clinical signal supporting the therapeutic efficacy of EGFR-Is in NP.
In a proof-of-concept trial using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, 14 patients with severe, chronic, therapy-resistant NP due to compressed peripheral nerves or complex regional pain syndrome were randomized to receive a single infusion of the EGFR-I cetuximab and placebo in crossover design, followed by a single open-label cetuximab infusion.
The mean reduction in daily average pain scores three to seven days after single-blinded cetuximab infusion was 1.73 points (90% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80 to 2.66), conferring a 1.22-point greater reduction than placebo (90% CI = -0.10 to 2.54). Exploratory analyses suggested that pain reduction might be greater in the 14 days after treatment with blinded cetuximab than after placebo. The proportion of patients who reported ≥50% reduction in average pain three to seven days after cetuximab was 36% (14% after placebo), and comparison of overall pain reduction suggests a trend in favor of cetuximab. Skin rash (grade 1-2) was the most frequent side effect (12/14, 86%).
This small proof-of-concept evaluation of an EGFR-I against NP did not provide statistical evidence of efficacy. However, substantial reductions in pain were reported, and confidence intervals do not rule out a clinically meaningful treatment effect. Evaluation of EGFR-I against NP therefore warrants further investigation.
病例报告和病例系列研究描述了表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(EGFR-Is)治疗后神经性疼痛(NP)得到缓解。这些观察结果得到了临床前研究结果的支持。本试验的目的是探索支持EGFR-Is治疗NP疗效的潜在临床信号。
在一项采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照设计的概念验证试验中,14例因周围神经受压或复杂性区域疼痛综合征导致严重、慢性、治疗抵抗性NP的患者被随机分组,采用交叉设计接受单次输注EGFR-I西妥昔单抗和安慰剂,随后接受单次开放标签的西妥昔单抗输注。
单盲输注西妥昔单抗后三至七天,每日平均疼痛评分的平均降低值为1.73分(90%置信区间[CI]=0.80至2.66),比安慰剂组多降低1.22分(90%CI=-0.10至2.54)。探索性分析表明,单盲西妥昔单抗治疗后14天的疼痛减轻可能比安慰剂治疗后更大。西妥昔单抗治疗后三至七天报告平均疼痛降低≥50%的患者比例为36%(安慰剂组为14%),总体疼痛减轻情况的比较表明有支持西妥昔单抗的趋势。皮疹(1-2级)是最常见的副作用(12/14,86%)。
这项针对NP的EGFR-I的小型概念验证评估未提供疗效的统计学证据。然而,报告显示疼痛有显著减轻,且置信区间不排除有临床意义的治疗效果。因此,针对NP的EGFR-I评估值得进一步研究。