Suppr超能文献

美国移植名单的医学禁忌:对成人和儿科心脏、肾脏、肝脏和肺计划的调查。

Medical Contraindications to Transplant Listing in the USA: A Survey of Adult and Pediatric Heart, Kidney, Liver, and Lung Programs.

机构信息

Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, 3410 Worth St. Ste 950, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.

School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2019 Sep;43(9):2300-2308. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05030-x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Listing practices for solid organ transplantation are variable across programs in the USA. To better characterize this variability, we performed a survey of psychosocial listing criteria for pediatric and adult heart, lung, liver, and kidney programs in the USA. In this manuscript, we report our results regarding listing practices with respect to obesity, advanced age, and HIV seropositivity.

METHODS

We performed an online, forced-choice survey of adult and pediatric heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplant programs in the USA.

RESULTS

Of 650 programs contacted, 343 submitted complete responses (response rate = 52.8%). Most programs have absolute contraindications to listing for BMI > 45 (adult: 67.5%; pediatric: 88.0%) and age > 80 (adult: 55.4%; pediatric: not relevant). Only 29.5% of adult programs and 25.7% of pediatric programs consider HIV seropositivity an absolute contraindication to listing. We found that there is variation in absolute contraindications to listing in adult programs among organ types for BMI > 45 (heart 89.8%, lung 92.3%, liver 49.1%, kidney 71.9%), age > 80 (heart 83.7%, lung 76.9%, liver 68.4%, kidney 29.2%), and HIV seropositivity (heart 30.6%, lung 59.0%, kidney 16.9%, liver 28.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

We argue that variability in listing enhances access to transplantation for potential recipients who have the ability to pursue workup at different centers by allowing different programs to have different risk thresholds. Programs should remain independent in listing practices, but because these practices differ, we recommend transparency in listing policies and informing patients of reasons for listing denial and alternative opportunities to seek listing at another program.

摘要

简介

在美国,各器官移植项目的实体器官移植名单制定实践存在差异。为了更好地描述这种变异性,我们对美国儿科和成人心脏、肺、肝和肾项目的心理社会名单制定标准进行了调查。在本文中,我们报告了有关肥胖、高龄和 HIV 阳性患者列入名单的实践结果。

方法

我们对美国成人和儿科心脏、肾脏、肝脏和肺移植项目进行了在线强制选择调查。

结果

在联系的 650 个项目中,有 343 个提交了完整的回复(回复率为 52.8%)。大多数项目对 BMI>45(成人:67.5%;儿科:88.0%)和年龄>80(成人:55.4%;儿科:不适用)有绝对禁忌症。只有 29.5%的成人项目和 25.7%的儿科项目将 HIV 阳性视为列入名单的绝对禁忌症。我们发现,在成人项目中,BMI>45(心脏 89.8%,肺 92.3%,肝 49.1%,肾 71.9%)、年龄>80(心脏 83.7%,肺 76.9%,肝 68.4%,肾 29.2%)和 HIV 阳性(心脏 30.6%,肺 59.0%,肾 16.9%,肝 28.1%)的列入名单绝对禁忌症存在差异。

结论

我们认为,列入名单的差异增强了有能力在不同中心进行检查的潜在受者接受移植的机会,允许不同的项目有不同的风险阈值。各项目应保持独立的列入名单做法,但由于这些做法存在差异,我们建议在列入名单政策方面保持透明度,并告知患者列入名单被拒绝的原因和在另一个项目寻求列入名单的替代机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验