Negri P, Campi F, De Crescenzo S, Garlati L, Tambussi O
CERAP SA, Cherbourg Octeville, France.
Politecnico di Milano, CeSNEF-Nuclear Engineering, Milano, Italy.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019 Dec 31;187(1):42-49. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncz136.
In IR procedures, in order to evaluate the effective dose, the importance of the double dosemeter has been recognised, one worn above and one under the apron. Over the last few decades several algorithms have been developed to combine the readings of the dosemeters, however currently there is no international consensus on which is the best one. In this work, eight irradiations, corresponding to typical interventional radiology procedures, were carried out in order to experimentally verify the accuracy of the algorithms. The patient was substituted by solid water-equivalent (RW3) layers, while effective dose to personnel was calculated by TLDs inside the Alderson Rando phantom. The results show that most of the algorithms, with a few exceptions, are too conservative, however there are many factors which can affect their accuracy, so it is impossible to achieve a high level of precision in the evaluation of the effective dose.
在介入放射学程序中,为了评估有效剂量,双剂量计的重要性已得到认可,一个佩戴在铅衣上方,一个佩戴在铅衣下方。在过去几十年里,已经开发了几种算法来组合剂量计的读数,然而目前对于哪种算法是最佳算法尚无国际共识。在这项工作中,进行了八次与典型介入放射学程序相对应的照射,以便通过实验验证算法的准确性。用等效固体水(RW3)层代替患者,而通过Alderson Rando体模内的热释光剂量计计算对人员的有效剂量。结果表明,除了少数例外,大多数算法都过于保守,然而有许多因素会影响其准确性,因此在有效剂量评估中不可能达到高精度水平。