Zhou Hui, Fu Xiaoyan, Li Qian, Niu Ting
Department of Hematology and Research Laboratory of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 1;10:387. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00387. eCollection 2019.
Immune checkpoint inhibition therapy with monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), including nivolumab and pembrolizumab, has demonstrated powerful clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced cancers. However, there is no evidence-based systematic review on the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody in treating lymphoma. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab/pembrolizumab, we analyzed clinical trials from PUBMED, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. For safety analysis, the incidence and exhibition of any grade and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Overall response rate (ORR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) and 6-month overall survival (OS) were calculated for efficacy analysis. Overall ten studies and 718 patients (114 non-Hodgkin lymphomas, 604 Hodgkin lymphomas) were enrolled, including 4 phase I studies and 6 phase II studies. The pooled incidences of any grade and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were 74 and 24%, respectively. Drug-related deaths occurred in two patients. The most common any grade AEs were fatigue (14.91%), rash (14.8%), hypothyroidism (13.77%), platelet count decreased (13.54%), pyrexia (13%). The most common grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (4.79%), pneumonitis (3.58%), rash (3.38%), and leukopenia (3.31%). Fatigue ( = 0.0072) and rash ( = 0.0078) in any grade AEs were less observed in patients treated with pembrolizumab than nivolumab. The pooled ORR, PFS rate and OS rate were 58, 73, and 96%, respectively. The ORR in patients with Hodgkin lymphomas (HL) was higher than patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) (69.08 vs. 30.77%, < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference of efficacy between nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab have promising outcomes with tolerable AEs and drug-related deaths in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. Pembrolizumab caused less any grade AEs like fatigue and rash than nivolumab. Patients with HL got better response than NHL.
使用抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)单克隆抗体的免疫检查点抑制疗法,包括纳武单抗和派姆单抗,已在晚期癌症治疗中显示出强大的临床疗效。然而,关于抗PD-1抗体治疗淋巴瘤的安全性和疗效,尚无基于证据的系统评价。为了评估纳武单抗/派姆单抗的安全性和疗效,我们分析了来自PubMed、EMBASE和考克兰图书馆的临床试验。对于安全性分析,评估了任何级别和≥3级不良事件(AE)的发生率和表现。计算总缓解率(ORR)、6个月无进展生存期(PFS)和6个月总生存期(OS)用于疗效分析。共纳入10项研究和718例患者(114例非霍奇金淋巴瘤、604例霍奇金淋巴瘤),包括4项I期研究和6项II期研究。任何级别和≥3级不良事件(AE)的合并发生率分别为74%和24%。两名患者发生与药物相关的死亡。最常见的任何级别AE为疲劳(14.91%)、皮疹(14.8%)、甲状腺功能减退(13.77%)、血小板计数降低(13.54%)、发热(13%)。最常见的≥3级AE为中性粒细胞减少(4.79%)、肺炎(3.58%)、皮疹(3.38%)和白细胞减少(3.31%)。接受派姆单抗治疗的患者在任何级别AE中出现疲劳(P = 0.0072)和皮疹(P = 0.0078)的情况少于接受纳武单抗治疗的患者。合并的ORR、PFS率和OS率分别为58%、73%和96%。霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)患者的ORR高于非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者(69.08%对30.77%,P < 0.0001)。然而,纳武单抗和派姆单抗之间的疗效无显著差异。纳武单抗和派姆单抗在复发或难治性淋巴瘤患者中具有良好的疗效,不良事件和与药物相关的死亡可耐受。派姆单抗引起的疲劳和皮疹等任何级别AE少于纳武单抗。HL患者的反应优于NHL患者。