Huilgol Yash S, Miron-Shatz Talya, Joshi Aditi U, Hollander Judd E
Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Center for Health and Well-Being, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Apr;26(4):455-461. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0029. Epub 2019 May 23.
Background:Telehealth can increase value by reducing gaps in care, access, and cost for patients, providers, and payers. Medicare reimbursement policies aim to increase health access in areas with a provider shortage.
Introduction:The influences of telehealth adoption over time are not well known, and would be beneficial for further policy discussion.
Materials and Methods:Using the Information Technology Supplement to the American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Acute Care Hospitals, we determined several predictors of telehealth adoption in California hospitals from 2012 to 2015.
Results:There were 870 hospitals evaluated. Telehealth adoption was more likely in 2014 and 2015. Compared with those not using telehealth, hospitals using telehealth were less likely to be located in more populated areas (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.98), nonrural areas as defined by metropolitan statistical area (OR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.20-0.70), and have a higher percentage of employed individuals (OR = 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.00-0.010). Hospitals were more likely to adopt telehealth if they had mobile device integration into the electronic health record (EHR) (OR = 2.97; 95% CI: 1.39-6.33) or a higher percentage of commuters in their ZIP code (OR = 20.24; 95% CI: 1.29-317.4). Telehealth reimbursement for health professional shortage areas did not contribute to increased telehealth adoption.
Discussion:The findings suggest how addressing current infrastructural and policy barriers may improve value-based care.
Conclusion:Our analysis suggests that telehealth has become more prominent since 2014, and factors such as significant commuting population, mobile device/EHR integration, and nonrural location influence adoption.
远程医疗可通过缩小患者、医疗服务提供者和支付方在医疗服务、可及性和成本方面的差距来提升价值。医疗保险报销政策旨在增加医疗服务短缺地区的医疗可及性。
远程医疗随时间推移的影响尚不为人所知,这对进一步的政策讨论有益。
利用美国医院协会急性病医院年度调查的信息技术补充资料,我们确定了2012年至2015年加利福尼亚州医院采用远程医疗的几个预测因素。
共评估了870家医院。2014年和2015年采用远程医疗的可能性更大。与未使用远程医疗的医院相比,使用远程医疗的医院位于人口更密集地区的可能性较小(优势比[OR]=0.74;95%置信区间[CI]:0.57 - 0.98),根据大都市统计区定义的非农村地区可能性较小(OR = 0.37;95% CI:0.20 - 0.70),且就业人员比例较高的可能性较小(OR = 0.0001;95% CI:0.00 - 0.010)。如果医院将移动设备集成到电子健康记录(EHR)中(OR = 2.97;95% CI:1.39 - 6.33)或其邮政编码区域内通勤者比例较高(OR = 20.24;95% CI:1.29 - 317.4),则更有可能采用远程医疗。医疗专业人员短缺地区的远程医疗报销对远程医疗采用率的提高没有贡献。
研究结果表明解决当前的基础设施和政策障碍可能如何改善基于价值医疗。
我们的分析表明,自2014年以来远程医疗变得更加突出,通勤人口众多、移动设备/EHR集成以及非农村地区等因素会影响其采用。