Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, School of Public Administration and Development Economics, P.O. Box: 200592, Zone 70, Al Tarfa Street Al-Daayen, Doha, Qatar.
Institut National de la Santé Publique and Ouranos, 945 Avenue Wolfe, Québec, QC G1V 5B3, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 22;16(10):1817. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101817.
Smog warning systems are components of adaptation strategies that are adopted by governments around the world to protect their citizens from extreme episodes of air pollution. As part of a growing research stream on the effectiveness of these systems, this article presents the results of a study on the impacts of an automated phone warning and advising system for individuals vulnerable to air pollution. A sample of 1328 individuals were recruited and randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. The treatment group received smog warning while the control group did not. Data were collected via three phone surveys, two before and one after issuing the smog warning. The comparison between treatment and control groups indicates that exposure to a smog warning improved information on the occurrence of smog episodes ( = 484, OR = 5.58, = 0.00), and knowledge on protective behaviors. Furthermore, members of treatment group were more likely to avoid exposure to smog episodes by spending more time inside with the windows closed than usual ( = 474, OR = 2.03, = 0.00). Members of treatment group who take medication in the form of aerosol pumps also kept these devices on themselves more frequently than those of control group (= 109, OR = 2.15, = 0.03). The system however had no discernible effects on the awareness of air pollution risks, reduction of health symptoms related to smog and the use of health system services. The absence of health benefits could be related to the lower actual exposure to air pollution of such vulnerable groups during winter.
雾霾预警系统是世界各国政府为保护其公民免受极端空气污染事件而采取的适应战略的组成部分。作为关于这些系统有效性的日益增长的研究趋势的一部分,本文介绍了一项针对针对易受空气污染影响的个人的自动电话警报和咨询系统影响的研究结果。招募了 1328 名参与者并将其随机分配到治疗组和对照组。治疗组收到雾霾预警,而对照组则没有。通过三个电话调查收集数据,在发布雾霾预警之前和之后进行了两次调查。治疗组和对照组之间的比较表明,接触雾霾预警提高了有关雾霾事件发生的信息(= 484,OR = 5.58,= 0.00),并提高了有关保护行为的知识。此外,与往常相比,治疗组的成员通过更多时间待在室内并关闭窗户来避免接触雾霾事件的可能性更大(= 474,OR = 2.03,= 0.00)。以气雾剂泵形式服药的治疗组成员比对照组成员更频繁地将这些设备放在自己身上(= 109,OR = 2.15,= 0.03)。但是,该系统对空气污染风险的认识,与雾霾有关的健康症状的减少以及对卫生系统服务的使用没有明显影响。由于这些弱势群体在冬季实际接触到的空气污染较低,因此没有健康益处。