Adjei David N, Stronks Karien, Adu Dwomoa, Beune Erik, Meeks Karlijn, Smeeth Liam, Addo Juliet, Owusu-Dabo Ellis, Klipstein-Grobusch Kerstin, Mockenhaupt Frank P, Danquah Ina, Spranger Joachim, Bahendeka Silver, De-Graft Aikins Ama, Agyemang Charles
Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e022610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022610.
Studies from high-income countries suggest higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among individuals in low socioeconomic groups. However, some studies from low/middle-income countries show the reverse pattern among those in high socioeconomic groups. It is unknown which pattern applies to individuals living in rural and urban Ghana. We assessed the association between socioeconomic status (SES) indicators and CKD in rural and urban Ghana and to what extent the higher SES of people in urban areas of Ghana could account for differences in CKD between rural and urban populations.
The study was conducted in Ghana (Ashanti region). We used baseline data from a multicentre Research on Obesity and Diabetes among African Migrants (RODAM) study.
The sample consisted of 2492 adults (Rural Ghana, 1043, Urban Ghana, 1449) aged 25-70 years living in Ghana.
Educational level, occupational level and wealth index.
Three CKD outcomes were considered using the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes severity of CKD classification: albuminuria, reduced glomerular filtration rate and high to very high CKD risk based on the combination of these two.
All three SES indicators were not associated with CKD in both rural and urban Ghana after age and sex adjustment except for rural Ghana where high wealth index was significantly associated with higher odds of reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (adjusted OR, 2.38; 95% CI 1.03 to 5.47). The higher rate of CKD observed in urban Ghana was not explained by the higher SES of that population.
SES indicators were not associated with prevalence of CKD except for wealth index and reduced eGFR in rural Ghana. Consequently, the higher SES of urban Ghana did not account for the increased rate of CKD among urban dwellers suggesting the need to identify other factors that may be driving this.
来自高收入国家的研究表明,社会经济地位较低群体中的个体患慢性肾脏病(CKD)的患病率更高。然而,一些来自低收入/中等收入国家的研究显示,社会经济地位较高群体中的个体呈现相反的模式。目前尚不清楚哪种模式适用于生活在加纳农村和城市的个体。我们评估了加纳农村和城市地区社会经济地位(SES)指标与CKD之间的关联,以及加纳城市地区人群较高的社会经济地位在多大程度上可以解释农村和城市人口之间CKD的差异。
该研究在加纳(阿散蒂地区)进行。我们使用了来自多中心非洲移民肥胖与糖尿病研究(RODAM)的基线数据。
样本包括2492名年龄在25至70岁之间、居住在加纳的成年人(加纳农村1043人,加纳城市1449人)。
教育水平、职业水平和财富指数。
根据2012年《肾脏病:改善全球预后》CKD严重程度分类标准,考虑了三种CKD结局:蛋白尿、肾小球滤过率降低以及基于这两者组合的高至非常高的CKD风险。
在对年龄和性别进行调整后,加纳农村和城市地区的所有三个SES指标均与CKD无关,但在加纳农村,高财富指数与估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)降低的较高几率显著相关(调整后的比值比,2.38;95%可信区间1.03至5.47)。加纳城市地区观察到的较高CKD发生率不能用该人群较高的社会经济地位来解释。
除了加纳农村的财富指数和eGFR降低外,SES指标与CKD患病率无关。因此,加纳城市地区较高的社会经济地位并不能解释城市居民中CKD发生率的增加,这表明需要确定可能导致这种情况的其他因素。