From the Cardiorenal Translational Laboratory and Hypertension Unit, Institute of Research i+12, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain (L.M.R., G.R.-H., J. Segura).
CIBER-CV, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain (L.M.R., G.R.-H., J.Solis, F.A.).
Hypertension. 2019 Jul;74(1):130-136. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12921. Epub 2019 May 28.
United States and European guidelines have recommended new treatment goals for office blood pressure (BP). We examined 9784 hypertensives of the Spanish Ambulatory BP Monitoring (ABPM) registry with office BP treated to the prior goal (<140/90 mm Hg); and evaluated the frequency and all-cause mortality of 4 BP strata depending on whether or not they attained more conservative or new office BP goal (130-139/80-89 and <130/80 mm Hg, respectively) and whether or not BP was controlled according to ABPM criteria in the European and US guidelines (24-hour ambulatory BP <130/80 and <125/75 mm Hg, respectively). Whether achieving or not the new office BP goal, the total-mortality risk during a 5-year follow-up was only significantly higher than the reference (normal office BP and ABPM) when 24-hour ambulatory BP was above goal (hazard ratio from multivariable Cox models was in the range of 2.4-2.9; P<0.001). The frequency of patients achieving the new office BP goal was 34.4%, and the frequencies of those not achieving the ABPM goal were 31.6% and 53.7% using the 130/80 or the 125/75 ABPM goal, respectively. Mean office systolic BP was 129 mm Hg for patients not achieving the ABPM goal. In hypertensive patients controlled under prior office BP goal, the frequency of those achieving new office BP goal <130/80 was high, suggesting this goal can be attained. In addition, patients had a higher mortality risk only when ABPM was above goal despite having mean office systolic BP under control, a condition that was also common.
美国和欧洲的指南推荐了新的诊室血压(BP)治疗目标。我们检查了西班牙动态血压监测(ABPM)登记处的 9784 名高血压患者,这些患者的诊室 BP 控制在先前的目标值(<140/90mmHg);并根据他们是否达到更保守或新的诊室 BP 目标(分别为 130-139/80-89 和 <130/80mmHg),以及是否根据欧洲和美国指南的 ABPM 标准控制 BP(24 小时动态 BP <130/80 和 <125/75mmHg),评估了 4 个 BP 分层的频率和全因死亡率。无论是否达到新的诊室 BP 目标,只要 24 小时动态 BP 高于目标值,5 年随访期间的总死亡率风险仅显著高于参考值(正常诊室 BP 和 ABPM)(多变量 Cox 模型的风险比范围为 2.4-2.9;P<0.001)。达到新的诊室 BP 目标的患者频率为 34.4%,而未达到 ABPM 目标的患者频率分别为 31.6%和 53.7%,分别使用 130/80 或 125/75 ABPM 目标。未达到 ABPM 目标的患者诊室收缩压平均为 129mmHg。在根据先前诊室 BP 目标控制的高血压患者中,达到新的诊室 BP 目标<130/80 的患者频率较高,表明这一目标可以达到。此外,尽管平均诊室收缩压得到控制,但当 ABPM 高于目标值时,患者的死亡率风险更高,这种情况也很常见。