Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, York, UK.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;113:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 May 28.
Methodological research has been undertaken to investigate the many challenges in searching for adverse effects data. It is imperative that the search approach adopted in systematic reviews is based on the best available evidence. We provide a detailed summary of the results and implications of the current evidence base to assist future searches for adverse effects.
This article is a narrative review from the authors of the Cochrane Handbook chapter on adverse effects.
The specified search strategy must be based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcome(s) format for question formulation and appropriate study designs for adverse effects data. Search filters and suggested search terms are available for the adverse effects of drug, medical devices, and surgical interventions. The use of generic adverse effects terms (such as harms and complications) as text words and indexing terms and specific adverse effects terms (such as rash and wound infection) are warranted. Searching databases beyond MEDLINE has proven useful, as well as the use of nondatabase sources.
This article provides the most up-to-date evidence-based guidance in identifying adverse effects data in the literature. It will support searchers and researchers evaluating the potential for harm of medical interventions in systematic reviews.
为了研究在搜索不良反应数据时所面临的诸多挑战,我们进行了方法学研究。至关重要的是,系统评价中所采用的搜索方法应基于现有最佳证据。我们提供了当前证据基础的结果和意义的详细总结,以协助未来对不良反应的搜索。
本文是 Cochrane 手册关于不良反应章节的作者进行的叙述性综述。
特定的搜索策略必须基于人群、干预、对照、结果(s)格式进行问题制定,并针对不良反应数据采用适当的研究设计。针对药物、医疗器械和手术干预的不良反应,我们提供了搜索过滤器和建议的搜索词。使用通用的不良反应术语(如危害和并发症)作为文本词和索引词,以及特定的不良反应术语(如皮疹和伤口感染)是合理的。除了 MEDLINE 之外,搜索其他数据库以及使用非数据库资源也被证明是有用的。
本文提供了最新的基于证据的指导,以在文献中识别不良反应数据。它将支持在系统评价中评估医疗干预潜在危害的搜索者和研究人员。