Fuseini Awal, Grist Andrew, Knowles Toby G
School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Animals (Basel). 2019 May 30;9(6):293. doi: 10.3390/ani9060293.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception and level of understanding of religious slaughter issues, and the regulations governing the process, amongst veterinary students in England. A total of 459 veterinary students in different levels, or years of study (years 1-5), were surveyed. On whether there is a need for food animals to be stunned prior to slaughter, the majority of respondents 437 (95.2%) indicated that they would want all animals to be stunned before slaughter, including during religious slaughter, 17 (3.6%) either did not have an opinion or indicated 'other' as their preferred option and 5 (1.1%) indicated that religious slaughter should be exempt from stunning in order to comply with traditional religious values. The results showed a significant association between respondents' year of study and (i) their understanding of UK animal welfare (at slaughter) regulations, (ii) their recognition of stunning as a pain-abolishing procedure and (iii) the likelihood of them wittingly purchasing and consuming meat from animals that have been stunned prior to slaughter, and also classified as Halal.
本研究的目的是评估英格兰兽医专业学生对宗教屠宰问题及其相关法规的认知和理解程度。共对459名不同年级(1至5年级)的兽医专业学生进行了调查。关于食用动物在屠宰前是否需要致晕,大多数受访者437人(95.2%)表示希望所有动物在屠宰前致晕,包括宗教屠宰过程中;17人(3.6%)没有意见或表示“其他”是他们的首选;5人(1.1%)表示宗教屠宰应免于致晕以符合传统宗教价值观。结果显示,受访者的年级与以下方面存在显著关联:(i)他们对英国动物福利(屠宰时)法规的理解;(ii)他们对致晕作为一种消除疼痛程序的认识;(iii)他们有意购买和食用来自屠宰前已致晕且被归类为清真肉类的可能性。