Suppr超能文献

肿瘤标志物在预测食管鳞癌预后和化疗效果中的临床应用。

Clinical use of tumor biomarkers in prediction for prognosis and chemotherapeutic effect in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Huanhuxi Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.

Department of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, 325027, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2019 May 31;19(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5755-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence has indicated that tumor biomarkers, including cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (Cyfra21-1), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) were reported to be commonly used in diagnosis and prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, which is the best marker for predicting prognosis remains unknown. Few papers focused on the relationship between tumor biomarkers and postoperative treatment in ESCC.

METHODS

A total of 416 ESCC patients were enrolled in this study. The association between tumor markers and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test, followed by multivariate Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The results of Cox multivariate analysis indicated that among these tumor biomarkers, CA19-9 (≥ 37 vs. < 37) [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.130, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.138-3.986, p = 0.018] and CEA (≥ 5 vs. < 5) (HR = 1.827, 95% CI = 1.089-3.064, p = 0.022) were the independent prognostic factors of poor OS. For the ESCC patients with CA19-9 < 37, CEA < 5 or SCC-Ag < 1.5, the surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy group had a significantly longer OS than the surgery group alone (p < 0.05), but this significant difference of OS between these two groups cannot be found in patients with CA19-9 ≥ 37, CEA ≥ 5 or SCC-Ag ≥ 1.5 (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CEA and CA19-9 maybe are superior to other tumor biomarkers as prognostic indicators in ESCC. CA19-9, CEA, SCC-Ag may be useful in predicting the therapeutic effect of postoperative chemotherapy in ESCC.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,肿瘤标志物,包括细胞角蛋白 19 片段抗原 21-1(Cyfra21-1)、糖抗原 19-9(CA19-9)、糖抗原 72-4(CA72-4)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)已被报道常用于诊断和预测食管癌(ESCC)的预后。然而,哪种标志物是预测预后的最佳标志物仍不清楚。很少有论文关注 ESCC 中肿瘤标志物与术后治疗之间的关系。

方法

本研究共纳入 416 例 ESCC 患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和对数秩检验分析肿瘤标志物与总生存期(OS)的关系,然后采用多变量 Cox 回归模型进行分析。

结果

Cox 多变量分析结果表明,在这些肿瘤标志物中,CA19-9(≥37 vs. <37)[风险比(HR)=2.130,95%置信区间(CI)=1.138-3.986,p=0.018]和 CEA(≥5 vs. <5)(HR=1.827,95%CI=1.089-3.064,p=0.022)是 OS 不良的独立预后因素。对于 CA19-9<37、CEA<5 或 SCC-Ag<1.5 的 ESCC 患者,手术加术后化疗组的 OS 明显长于单纯手术组(p<0.05),但在 CA19-9≥37、CEA≥5 或 SCC-Ag≥1.5 的患者中,这两组之间的 OS 差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

CEA 和 CA19-9 可能是优于其他肿瘤标志物作为 ESCC 的预后指标。CA19-9、CEA、SCC-Ag 可能有助于预测 ESCC 术后化疗的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ccf/6544972/b3e04c940508/12885_2019_5755_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验