• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对经历亲密伴侣暴力的女性的在线健康关系工具和安全决策辅助工具(I-DECIDE):一项随机对照试验。

An online healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence (I-DECIDE): a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jun;4(6):e301-e310. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30079-9.

DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30079-9
PMID:31155223
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence for online interventions to help women experiencing intimate partner violence is scarce. We assessed whether an online interactive healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid (I-DECIDE) would increase women's self-efficacy and improve depressive symptoms compared with an intimate partner violence information website.

METHODS

In this two-group pragmatic randomised controlled trial, we enrolled women who had screened positive for any form of intimate partner violence or fear of a partner in the 6 months before recruitment. Women aged 16-50 years currently residing in Australia, who had safe access to a computer and an internet connection, and who answered positively to one of the screening questions in English were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer to receive either the intervention or control website. The intervention website consisted of modules on healthy relationships, abuse and safety, and relationship priority setting, and a tailored action plan. The control website was a static intimate partner violence information website. As the initial portion of the website containing the baseline questions was identical for both groups, there was no way for women to tell which group they had been allocated to, and the research team were also masked to participant allocation until after analysis of the 12-month data. Data were collected at baseline, immediately after completion of the website, at 6 months, and 12 months. Primary outcomes were mean general self-efficacy score (immediately after website completion, and at 6 months and 12 months) and mean depression score (at 6 months and 12 months). Data analyses were done according to intention-to-treat principles, accounting for missing data, and adjusted for outcome baseline scores. This trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN 12614001306606.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 16, and Aug 28, 2015, 584 patients registered for the study and were assessed for eligibility. 422 eligible participants were randomly allocated to the intervention group (227 patients) or control group (195 patients). 179 (79%) participants in the intervention group and 156 (80%) participants in the control group completed 12-month follow-up. Mean self-efficacy at 6 months and 12 months was lower for participants in the intervention group than for participants in the control group, although this did not meet the prespecified mean difference (6 months: 27·5 [SD 5·1] vs 28·1 [4·4], imputed mean difference 1·3 [95% CI 0·3 to 2·3]; 12 months: 27·8 [SD 5·4] vs 29·0 [5·0], imputed mean difference 1·6 [95% CI 0·5 to 2·7]). We found no difference between groups in depressive symptoms at 6 months or 12 months (6 months: 22·5 [SD 17·1] vs 24·2 [17·2], imputed mean difference -0·3 [95% CI -3·5 to 3·0]; 12 months: 21·9 [SD 19·3] vs 21·5 [19·3], imputed mean difference -1·9 [95% CI -5·6 to 1·7]). Qualitative findings indicated that participants found the intervention supportive and a motivation for action.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings highlight the need for further research, development, and refinement of online interventions for women experiencing intimate partner violence, particularly into the duration needed for interventions. Although we detected no meaningful differences between groups, our qualitative results indicated that some women find an online tool a helpful source of motivation and support.

FUNDING

Australian Research Council.

摘要

背景

目前,有关在线干预措施帮助遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的证据还很少。我们评估了一种在线互动式健康关系工具和安全决策辅助工具(I-DECIDE)是否会比亲密伴侣暴力信息网站更能提高女性的自我效能感和改善抑郁症状。

方法

这是一项两组成熟的随机对照试验,我们招募了在招募前 6 个月内筛查出任何形式的亲密伴侣暴力或对伴侣感到恐惧的女性。年龄在 16-50 岁之间、目前居住在澳大利亚、安全使用计算机和互联网的女性,以及对用英文回答的筛查问题之一回答为肯定的女性,有资格入选。参与者通过计算机随机分配(1:1)接受干预或对照网站。干预网站包括关于健康关系、虐待和安全以及关系优先事项设置的模块,以及量身定制的行动计划。对照网站是一个静态的亲密伴侣暴力信息网站。由于两个组的初始部分包含基线问题的网站是相同的,因此女性无法知道她们被分配到哪个组,并且研究团队在分析 12 个月的数据之前也不知道参与者的分配情况。数据在基线、完成网站后立即、6 个月和 12 个月时收集。主要结果是一般自我效能感评分的平均值(在完成网站后、6 个月和 12 个月时)和抑郁评分的平均值(在 6 个月和 12 个月时)。数据分析按照意向治疗原则进行,考虑了缺失数据,并根据结果基线评分进行了调整。该试验在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为 ACTRN 12614001306606。

结果

在 2015 年 1 月 16 日至 8 月 28 日期间,有 584 名患者注册参加了该研究,并对其进行了资格评估。422 名合格的参与者被随机分配到干预组(227 名患者)或对照组(195 名患者)。179 名(79%)干预组参与者和 156 名(80%)对照组参与者完成了 12 个月的随访。与对照组参与者相比,干预组参与者在 6 个月和 12 个月时的自我效能感较低,尽管这并没有达到预设的平均差异(6 个月:27.5 [5.1] 与 28.1 [4.4],估计平均差异 1.3 [95%CI 0.3-2.3];12 个月:27.8 [5.4] 与 29.0 [5.0],估计平均差异 1.6 [95%CI 0.5-2.7])。我们没有发现两组在 6 个月或 12 个月时的抑郁症状有差异(6 个月:22.5 [17.1] 与 24.2 [17.2],估计平均差异 0.3 [95%CI 3.5-3.0];12 个月:21.9 [19.3] 与 21.5 [19.3],估计平均差异 1.9 [95%CI 5.6-1.7])。定性结果表明,参与者发现干预措施具有支持性,并为采取行动提供了动力。

解释

我们的研究结果强调了需要进一步研究、开发和完善针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的在线干预措施,特别是需要研究干预措施需要多长时间。尽管我们没有发现两组之间有明显的差异,但我们的定性结果表明,一些女性发现在线工具是一个有帮助的动力和支持来源。

资金

澳大利亚研究理事会。

相似文献

1
An online healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence (I-DECIDE): a randomised controlled trial.一项针对经历亲密伴侣暴力的女性的在线健康关系工具和安全决策辅助工具(I-DECIDE):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jun;4(6):e301-e310. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30079-9.
2
Efficacy of a Web-Based Safety Decision Aid for Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的亲密伴侣暴力受害女性安全决策辅助工具的效果:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 10;19(12):e426. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8617.
3
Screening and counselling in the primary care setting for women who have experienced intimate partner violence (WEAVE): a cluster randomised controlled trial.在初级保健环境中对经历过亲密伴侣暴力的女性进行筛查和咨询(WEAVE):一项集群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):249-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60052-5. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
4
A tailored online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: the iCAN Plan 4 Safety randomized controlled trial protocol.针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的定制化在线安全与健康干预措施:“我能安全计划”4的随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4143-9.
5
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a web-based healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing domestic violence (I-DECIDE).一项针对遭受家庭暴力女性的基于网络的健康关系工具和安全决策辅助工具(I-DECIDE)的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 1;15:736. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2072-z.
6
Longitudinal impacts of an online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: randomized controlled trial.在线安全和健康干预对经历亲密伴侣暴力的女性的纵向影响:随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8152-8.
7
Effectiveness of the SAFE eHealth Intervention for Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse: Randomized Controlled Trial, Quantitative Process Evaluation, and Open Feasibility Study.SAFE 电子健康干预措施对遭受亲密伴侣暴力和虐待的女性的有效性:随机对照试验、定量过程评估和开放性可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 27;25:e42641. doi: 10.2196/42641.
8
A web-based intervention for abused women: the New Zealand isafe randomised controlled trial protocol.一项针对受虐妇女的网络干预措施:新西兰isafe随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 31;15:56. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1395-0.
9
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a healthy relationship tool for men who use intimate partner violence (BETTER MAN).使用亲密伴侣暴力的男性健康关系工具(BETTER MAN)的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 2;23(1):2395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17032-5.
10
Safe Pregnancy intervention for intimate partner violence: a randomised controlled trial in Norway among culturally diverse pregnant women.安全妊娠干预亲密伴侣暴力:挪威文化多元化孕妇的随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 21;22(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04400-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobile Apps to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG): Systematic App Research and Content Analysis.预防暴力侵害妇女和女童行为的移动应用程序:系统的应用程序研究与内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 23;9:e66247. doi: 10.2196/66247.
2
Planning for successful participant recruitment and retention in trials of behavioural interventions: Feasibility randomised controlled trial of the Wrapped intervention.行为干预试验中成功招募和留住参与者的规划:Wrapped干预的可行性随机对照试验
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 29;4(5):e0000875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000875. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Impact of a Digital Decision Aid When Choosing Between Face-to-Face and Guided Internet-Based Psychological Interventions for Depression Among Chinese-Speaking Participants in Hong Kong: Randomized Controlled Trial.
数字决策辅助工具对香港讲中文参与者在面对面与基于互联网引导的抑郁症心理干预之间进行选择时的影响:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e54727. doi: 10.2196/54727.
4
Developing a brief online psychoeducational intervention for Latina survivors of intimate partner violence.为亲密伴侣暴力的拉丁裔幸存者开发一种简短的在线心理教育干预措施。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251329638. doi: 10.1177/17455057251329638. Epub 2025 May 2.
5
Interventions to prevent violence against women and girls globally: a global systematic review of reviews to update the RESPECT women framework.全球预防暴力侵害妇女和女童行为的干预措施:对各项综述进行的全球系统性综述,以更新“尊重妇女”框架
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jan 20;3(1):e001126. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001126. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
A systematic review on eHealth technology personalization approaches.关于电子健康技术个性化方法的系统评价。
iScience. 2024 Aug 19;27(9):110771. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110771. eCollection 2024 Sep 20.
7
Navigating Online and in-Person Support: Views and Experiences From Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse.探索线上与线下支持:亲密伴侣暴力与虐待幸存者的观点和经历
Violence Against Women. 2024 Aug 8;31(11):10778012241270223. doi: 10.1177/10778012241270223.
8
Engaging Parents in Technology-Assisted Interventions for Childhood Adversity: Systematic Review.让家长参与儿童逆境的技术辅助干预:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 19;26:e43994. doi: 10.2196/43994.
9
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a healthy relationship tool for men who use intimate partner violence (BETTER MAN).使用亲密伴侣暴力的男性健康关系工具(BETTER MAN)的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 2;23(1):2395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17032-5.
10
Key Factors in Helpfulness and Use of the SAFE Intervention for Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse: Qualitative Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial and Process Evaluation.《经历亲密伴侣暴力和虐待的女性对 SAFE 干预措施的帮助和使用的关键因素:一项随机对照试验和过程评估的定性结果》。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 21;25:e42647. doi: 10.2196/42647.