Cristóvão Irina, Reis-Pina Paulo
Internship in General Surgery. Unidade Local de Saúde do Nordeste. Bragança.
Unidade de Cuidados Paliativos. Casa de Saúde da Idanha. Sintra. Unidade de Cuidados Paliativos. Domus Fraternitas. Montariol. Braga. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Lisboa. Lisboa. Portugal.
Acta Med Port. 2019 May 31;32(5):338-347. doi: 10.20344/amp.10773.
The International Association for the Study of Pain advocates a mandatory curriculum on chronic pain in medical schools. The objective of this study was to assess the opinions of final year medical students and interns about chronic pain education in eight Portuguese medical schools.
Cross-sectional study. Online questionnaire (30 questions; voluntary and anonymous responses) available in the first quarter of 2016.
A total of 251 responses were received from 142 finalists and 109 interns (women 72.9%; 25.3 ± 1.6 years). Pain is a vital sign (92.4%), but 18.7% only assessed pain if the patient complained of it. Pain self-assessment scales were known (87.2%), but the hetero-evaluation was not (70.9%). Pain was not assessed regularly because patients may not express pain; lack of time; short duration of consultations. Education was insufficient on opioids (78.1%), pathophysiology and treatment of pain (66.1%) and interviewing patients with pain (67.7%); it lasted 1 to 10 hours (median). Respiratory depression was the most worrying effect of opioids (56.2%). The risks of opioids outweigh the clinical benefit (33.5%).
Education on chronic pain is scattered, unstructured and optional. More education is required in medical schools (98.4%). It should occur in year 5 and last more than 15 hours. Clinical stages are advised in chronic pain clinics.
There is a need for improvement in the medical undergraduate curricula so that young doctors develop competencies to adequately control pain and fight the avoidable suffering of their patients.
国际疼痛研究协会主张在医学院校开设慢性疼痛必修课程。本研究的目的是评估葡萄牙八所医学院校的医学专业最后一年学生和实习生对慢性疼痛教育的看法。
横断面研究。2016年第一季度提供在线问卷(30个问题;自愿且匿名回答)。
共收到142名最后一年学生和109名实习生的251份回复(女性占72.9%;年龄25.3±1.6岁)。疼痛是一项生命体征(92.4%),但只有18.7%的人仅在患者主诉疼痛时才进行评估。疼痛自评量表为人所知(87.2%),但他评量表则不然(70.9%)。未定期评估疼痛是因为患者可能不表达疼痛;时间不足;会诊时间短。关于阿片类药物(78.1%)、疼痛的病理生理学和治疗(66.1%)以及对疼痛患者进行问诊(67.7%)的教育不足;教育时长为1至10小时(中位数)。呼吸抑制是阿片类药物最令人担忧的效应(56.2%)。阿片类药物的风险超过临床益处(33.5%)。
慢性疼痛教育分散、无组织且为选修。医学院校需要更多教育(98.4%)。应在五年级开展,且时长超过15小时。建议在慢性疼痛诊所设置临床阶段。
医学本科课程需要改进,以便年轻医生培养出充分控制疼痛和消除患者可避免痛苦的能力。