Suppr超能文献

新型认知障碍和神经精神症状筛查在心脏康复中的有效性。

Validity of a novel screen for cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms in cardiac rehabilitation.

机构信息

Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1177-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no composite screening tool that can efficiently and effectively assess prevalent yet under-recognized cognitive and neuropsychiatric comorbidities in patients with cardiovascular disease. We aimed to determine the validity and feasibility of a novel screen assessing cognitive impairment, anxiety, apathy and depression (CAAD screen) in those attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors entering CR were screened as part of clinical care. A subset of those patients agreed to complete validation assessments (n = 127). Screen results were compared to widely accepted standards for cognition, anxiety, apathy, and depression using a modified receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve analysis.

RESULTS

The screen was completed by 97% of participants in 10 min or less with an average completion time of approximately 5 min. Screening scores adjusted for age, sex and years of education had acceptable or excellent validity compared to widely accepted standard diagnoses: CAAD-Cog (AUC = 0.80); CAAD-Anx (AUC = 0.81); CAAD-Apathy (AUC = 0.79) and CAAD-Dep (AUC = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

The CAAD screen may be a valid and feasible tool for detecting cognitive impairment, anxiety, apathy and depression in CR settings.

摘要

背景

目前,尚无综合筛查工具可有效评估心血管疾病患者普遍存在但尚未被认识到的认知和神经精神共病。我们旨在确定一种新型筛查工具(评估认知障碍、焦虑、淡漠和抑郁的 CAAD 筛查)在参加心脏康复(CR)的患者中的有效性和可行性。

方法

所有被诊断为心血管疾病或心血管危险因素的患者在进入 CR 时都接受了作为临床护理一部分的筛查。其中一部分患者同意完成验证评估(n=127)。使用修改后的接受者操作特征(ROC)和曲线下面积分析,将屏幕结果与认知、焦虑、淡漠和抑郁的广泛接受标准进行比较。

结果

屏幕由 97%的参与者在 10 分钟或更短时间内完成,平均完成时间约为 5 分钟。经过年龄、性别和受教育年限调整的筛查评分与广泛接受的标准诊断相比具有可接受或优异的有效性:CAAD-Cog(AUC=0.80);CAAD-Anx(AUC=0.81);CAAD-Apathy(AUC=0.79)和 CAAD-Dep(AUC=0.85)。

结论

CAAD 筛查可能是在 CR 环境中检测认知障碍、焦虑、淡漠和抑郁的有效且可行的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验