Kashanian Maryam, Eshraghi Noushin, Rahimi Maryam, Sheikhansari Narges, Javanmanesh Forough
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Akbarabadi Teaching Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;40(1):20-24. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1587598. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
A double-blind randomised trial was conducted on women with gestational age of 40-42 weeks of pregnancy and Bishop score of more than 5. The first group received oxytocin infusion and the second group received a titrated oral solution of misoprostol. Then, the two groups were compared by the primary outcome (the number of deliveries in the first 24 hours of intervention). The two groups did not have any significant difference in maternal and gestational age at the time of intervention, primary Bishop score, parity and neonatal weight. The number of deliveries in the first 24 hours was greater in the misoprostol group. Duration of onset of intervention to proper contractions was longer in the misoprostol group. However, the number of deliveries between 6-12 hours, 12-18 hours and 18-24 hours after induction was greater in the misoprostol group. The incidence of tachysystole and meconium was greater in the misoprostol group.Impact statement Labour induction is widely used where the continuation of pregnancy might be dangerous for the mother or the baby. Of the various methods used for induction, misoprostol which is a prostaglandin E1 analogue has been reviewed more in recent years. Misoprostol has various routes of administration but in most studies only vaginal administration has been evaluated, leaving us with limited data about oral administration. Oral misoprostol is a suitable method for labour induction and can be used as an alternative to oxytocin. Misoprostol is not expensive, has a long shelf life, accessible in underdeveloped countries and rural areas and has several routes of administrations such as oral, sublingual and vaginal. Despite the fact that the oral route of misoprostol has a fast absorption and easier administration, there are relatively few studies assessing the the use of the oral route of misoprostol. Misoprostol is a suitable method for Labour induction and it has the potentials of being used as an alternative for oxytocin, however, the optimum dosages, the preferred route of administration, the maximum dose, the maximum time for administration, and maternal and neonatal safety should be studied more.
对孕周为40 - 42周且 Bishop 评分大于5的孕妇进行了一项双盲随机试验。第一组接受缩宫素静脉滴注,第二组接受米索前列醇滴定口服溶液。然后,通过主要结局(干预后24小时内的分娩次数)对两组进行比较。两组在干预时的产妇年龄和孕周、初始 Bishop 评分、产次及新生儿体重方面均无显著差异。米索前列醇组干预后24小时内的分娩次数更多。米索前列醇组从干预开始到出现规律宫缩的时间更长。然而,引产术后6 - 12小时、12 - 18小时和18 - 24小时米索前列醇组的分娩次数更多。米索前列醇组宫缩过速和胎粪排出的发生率更高。
影响声明
引产在继续妊娠可能对母亲或胎儿有危险的情况下广泛使用。在用于引产的各种方法中,作为前列腺素E1类似物的米索前列醇近年来受到了更多的审视。米索前列醇有多种给药途径,但在大多数研究中仅评估了阴道给药,这使得我们关于口服给药的数据有限。口服米索前列醇是一种合适的引产方法,可作为缩宫素的替代方法。米索前列醇价格不贵,保质期长,在不发达国家和农村地区容易获得,并且有多种给药途径,如口服、舌下含服和阴道给药。尽管米索前列醇口服途径吸收快且给药方便,但评估米索前列醇口服途径使用情况的研究相对较少。米索前列醇是一种合适的引产方法,有潜力作为缩宫素的替代方法,然而,最佳剂量、首选给药途径、最大剂量、最大给药时间以及母婴安全性应进行更多研究。