Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;29:134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
The palliative surgical outcome score (PSOS) was proposed for evaluation of the effect of palliative surgical interventions. As a surrogate measure for successful symptom control, it is defined as the proportion of days outside the hospital of the remaining life time up to six months after a palliative intervention. In this study we evaluate the PSOS in patients treated palliatively with self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) for incurable malignant colorectal obstruction.
All eligible patients endoscopically treated with palliative intent with SEMSs were identified. Demographics and clinical characteristics, including complete follow-up, were recorded, and the PSOS was calculated. Non-parametric tests were used for comparisons, and survival was evaluated by univariable and multivariable analyses.
Between 2005 and 2013, 116 patients (median age 71.5 years; 53.4% women) were identified. Most obstructions were caused by primary colorectal cancers. Technical- and clinical success rates were 94.0% and 87.1%, respectively. Procedure-related complications occurred in 17 (14.7%) of the patients, and most were minor. A PSOS>70 (regarded as excellent palliation) was achieved in 79 (68.1%) patients. This goal was significantly more often achieved in patients who survived at least 6 months than in those with shorter survival (p < 0.001). No clinical variables at the time of the endoscopic palliative procedure could predict a PSOS>70. However, in patients who survived at least 6 months (n = 69), a PSOS>70 was independently associated with better survival in the multivariable Cox analysis.
PSOS could be used as a practical proxy or a pragmatic tool for the effectiveness of palliative interventions, when such interventions are compared. Clinical factors that could significantly add to the clinical decision-making and predict a PSOS>70 in an individual patient were not identified for this specific group of patients.
姑息性手术结局评分(PSOS)是为评估姑息性手术干预效果而提出的。作为成功控制症状的替代指标,它定义为姑息性干预后 6 个月内剩余生命时间中在院外度过的天数比例。本研究评估了不可治愈的恶性结直肠梗阻患者接受自膨式金属支架(SEMS)姑息性治疗的 PSOS。
确定所有符合条件的接受姑息性意向内镜治疗的 SEMS 患者。记录人口统计学和临床特征,包括完整随访,并计算 PSOS。采用非参数检验进行比较,采用单变量和多变量分析评估生存情况。
2005 年至 2013 年间,共确定了 116 名患者(中位年龄 71.5 岁;53.4%为女性)。大多数梗阻是由原发性结直肠癌引起的。技术和临床成功率分别为 94.0%和 87.1%。17 名(14.7%)患者发生与操作相关的并发症,多数为轻微并发症。79 名(68.1%)患者达到 PSOS>70(视为姑息性治疗效果极好)。与生存时间较短的患者相比,至少存活 6 个月的患者更常达到 PSOS>70(p<0.001)。在进行内镜姑息性治疗时,没有任何临床变量可以预测 PSOS>70。然而,在至少存活 6 个月的患者中(n=69),PSOS>70 在多变量 Cox 分析中与生存时间的改善独立相关。
在比较姑息性干预措施的有效性时,PSOS 可以用作实际的替代指标或实用工具。对于这组特定的患者,没有确定能够显著增加临床决策并预测 PSOS>70 的临床因素。