Suppr超能文献

对于学龄前儿童的视力评估,LEA符号比斯内伦视力表更好吗?

Is LEA symbol better compared to Snellen chart for visual acuity assessment in preschool children?

作者信息

Vivekanand Undrakonda, Gonsalves Sarita, Bhat Shailaja S

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Alluri Sitaramaraju Academy of Medical Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Department of Ophthalmology, Father Muller's Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Rom J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan-Mar;63(1):35-37.

Abstract

To compare visual acuity using the LEA symbol chart with Snellen E test chart in preschool children of age 3-5 years. : 50 emmetropic children aged 3 to 5 years. Strabismus, amblyopia, ametropia, and any organic eye disease. A pseudo randomized protocol was used to test visual acuity (VA) in each subject monocularly on both eyes using Snellen E chart and LEA symbol chart. Visual acuity for both charts was scored as smallest optotype size which the child correctly identified 3 of maximum 4 optotypes. The strength of agreement on VA between two charts was tested using Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare both the groups. Boys: Girls = 26:24 with a mean age and standard deviation of 4.12 + 0.79 years. ICC between Snellen's and LEA symbol chart was 0.256 and 0.213 for right and left eye respectively. Analysis of the two samples using Mann-Whitney test showed a significant difference between the two charts (p value <0.000). LEA symbol test showed only a fair agreement with Snellen E charts for visual acuity measurements. Visual acuity measurement with LEA symbol chart showed significantly higher scores as compared to Snellen's chart.

摘要

比较LEA符号视力表与斯内伦E字视力表在3至5岁学龄前儿童中的视力检测结果。:50名年龄在3至5岁的正视儿童。排除斜视、弱视、屈光不正及任何器质性眼病患者。采用伪随机方案,使用斯内伦E字视力表和LEA符号视力表对每位受试者的双眼进行单眼视力检测。两张视力表的视力评分均为儿童能正确识别4个视标中3个的最小视标尺寸。使用组内相关系数(ICC)检验两张视力表在视力检测结果上的一致性强度。应用曼-惠特尼U检验比较两组结果。男:女 = 26:24,平均年龄及标准差为4.12 ± 0.79岁。斯内伦视力表与LEA符号视力表在右眼和左眼的ICC分别为0.256和0.213。使用曼-惠特尼检验对两个样本进行分析,结果显示两张视力表之间存在显著差异(p值<0.000)。在视力测量方面,LEA符号视力表与斯内伦E字视力表的一致性一般。与斯内伦视力表相比,使用LEA符号视力表测量的视力得分显著更高。

相似文献

3
Comparison of visual acuity results in preschool children with lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie E chart.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct-Dec;20(4):345-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.120020.
4
Diagnostic accuracy and agreement between visual acuity charts for detecting significant refractive errors in preschoolers.
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 May;103(3):347-352. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12962. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
5
Comparing Visual Acuity Measured by Lea Symbols and Patti Pics.
Am Orthopt J. 2015;65:94-8. doi: 10.3368/aoj.65.1.94.
7
[Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006 Jan;223(1):24-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858613.
8
Is vision screening in 3-year-old children feasible? Comparison between the Lea Symbol chart and the HVOT (LM) chart.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005 Feb;83(1):76-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00367.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Building capacity: paediatric vision screening in elementary schools.
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2025 Dec;84(1):2525621. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2025.2525621. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
2
Comparison between Different Visual Acuity Tests and Validation of a Digital Device.
Vision (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;8(3):57. doi: 10.3390/vision8030057.
3
Early Visual Deprivation Impairs Functional Development of the Visual Ventral Stream.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023 Aug 1;64(11):1. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.11.1.
5
Pediatric Eye Evaluations Preferred Practice Pattern.
Ophthalmology. 2023 Mar;130(3):P222-P270. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.10.030. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
6
A computerized resolution visual acuity test in preschool and school age children.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 18;13(2):284-291. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.02.13. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验