CyberGIS Center for Advanced Digital and Spatial Studies, Department of Geography and Geographic Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Trop Med Int Health. 2019 Aug;24(8):962-971. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13280. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
The effects of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions have been well acknowledged to reduce the risk from diarrheal disease-causing pathogens. In spite of the recognized importance of WASH interventions on the reduction of diarrheal disease, there are still gaps in the understanding of the time-varying effects of interventions. To bridge this research gap, we developed agent-based models (ABMs) of diarrheal disease transmission in a community context. In the model, infections occur via two pathways: (i) between household members within the household environment and (ii) from the community environment outside the household. To measure the effectiveness of WASH interventions, we performed global sensitivity analysis (GSA) at the macro and micro temporal scales, varying the level of intervention coverage in the community. We simulated three intervention strategies, implemented separately in the experiments. The clean drinking water intervention, sanitation intervention, and hand washing intervention had similar success rates in the long-term. The handwashing intervention had the largest immediate effect. This highlights that proper short- and long-term intervention strategies need to be considered for disease control and the effective management of limited resources.
水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施的效果已得到充分证实,可以降低腹泻病病原体的风险。尽管人们认识到 WASH 干预措施对减少腹泻病的重要性,但对于干预措施的时变效果仍存在理解上的差距。为了弥合这一研究差距,我们开发了基于代理的社区环境中腹泻病传播模型。在该模型中,感染通过两种途径发生:(i)家庭环境内的家庭成员之间,以及(ii)家庭以外的社区环境。为了衡量 WASH 干预措施的有效性,我们在宏观和微观时间尺度上进行了全局敏感性分析(GSA),在社区层面上改变了干预措施的覆盖水平。我们模拟了三种干预策略,分别在实验中实施。在长期来看,清洁饮用水干预、卫生干预和洗手干预具有相似的成功率。洗手干预的即时效果最大。这表明需要考虑适当的短期和长期干预策略,以控制疾病和有效管理有限的资源。