Department of Pedodontics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona Str. 15a, 15-297, Bialystok, Poland.
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland.
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Oct;34(8):1655-1663. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02762-z. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
The aim of this study is to assess the extent of early carious lesions using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II and DIAGNOdent pen compared with microCT examination. Forty-eight molars and premolars were qualified for the study. The visual and the DIAGNOdent pen device examinations were carried out by two examiners. The actual extent of the lesions was determined using micro-CT examination. The optimal cutoff test value was determined using the Youden index. For the two methods, inter- and intra-examiner reproducibility was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of these methods were compared using the mid-P McNemar test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. In terms of the enamel threshold for the ICDAS II scale, insignificantly higher mean evaluated parameters were noticed in comparison with the DIAGNOdent pen device. For the dentin threshold, all the assessed parameters had higher mean values on the ICDAS II scale compared with the DIAGNOdent pen. The optimal cutoff points of the enamel and dentin thresholds are lower than that suggested by the manufacturer. The ICDAS II and the DIAGNOdent pen device were characterized by high inter - and intra-observer reproducibility of the test results. To improve the diagnostic efficiency of the DIAGNOdent pen, modifying the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturers should be considered. After modifying the cutoff values, the combination ICDAS II and DIAGNOdent pen device would be the better choice in order to detect caries on occlusal surfaces.
本研究旨在评估使用国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAS)II 和 DIAGNOdent 笔与 microCT 检查相比,早期龋损的程度。48 颗磨牙和前磨牙符合研究条件。目视检查和 DIAGNOdent 笔设备检查由两名检查者进行。使用 micro-CT 检查确定病变的实际程度。使用 Youden 指数确定最佳截断测试值。对于这两种方法,使用组内相关系数计算了检查者间和检查者内的重现性。使用中值 McNemar 检验比较这些方法的敏感性、特异性和准确性。显著性水平设置为 p < 0.05。就 ICDAS II 量表的釉质阈值而言,与 DIAGNOdent 笔设备相比,评估参数的平均值略高,但无统计学意义。对于牙本质阈值,与 DIAGNOdent 笔相比,所有评估参数在 ICDAS II 量表上的平均值均较高。釉质和牙本质阈值的最佳截断点低于制造商建议的值。ICDAS II 和 DIAGNOdent 笔设备的测试结果具有很高的检查者间和检查者内重现性。为了提高 DIAGNOdent 笔的诊断效率,应考虑修改制造商推荐的截止值。修改截止值后,为了检测咬合面的龋齿,将 ICDAS II 和 DIAGNOdent 笔设备相结合将是更好的选择。