Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, 1250 14th Street, Denver, CO, 80204, United States.
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Aug;94:104029. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104029. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
Several studies suggest that prosocial behaviors gradually increase with age, but others report that prosocial behaviors are fixed traits with only minor fluctuations throughout the lifespan. Early life stress may help explain these inconsistencies, as distinct types of stress have been negatively or positively associated with prosocial behaviors.
This current investigation used two studies to test whether distinct types of early life stress moderated the association between age and prosocial behavior.
Study 1 recruited undergraduate students (n = 69) between the ages of 18-35, and Study 2 was conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk responders (n = 499) whose ages ranged from 18-74.
Study 1 employed behavioral economic tasks to measure cooperation and charitability, while Study 2 utilized an online survey to measure helping attitudes.
Moderation analyses revealed the association between age and cooperation was significantly weakened by a history of family violence (β=-0.37,p = 0.002), community violence (β=-0.30,p = 0.012), emotional abuse (β=-0.27,p = 0.026), and an overall summary score of early life stress (β=-0.33,p = 0.006). The relationship between age and charitability was only weakened by family violence (β=-0.24,p = 0.048). The association between age and helping attitudes was weakened by family violence (β=-0.10, p = 0.023), community violence (β=-0.13,p = 0.003), and physical neglect (β=-0.11,p = 0.018).
Collectively, these results suggest that some types of early life stress, especially exposure to violent environments, may reduce the likelihood of prosocial behaviors increasing throughout the lifespan. This study suggests that age-related effects on prosocial behaviors may not be universal, but rather depend on individual differences in childhood stress.
多项研究表明亲社会行为会随着年龄的增长而逐渐增加,但也有研究报告称亲社会行为是固定特征,在整个生命周期中只有微小的波动。早期生活压力可能有助于解释这些不一致的现象,因为不同类型的压力与亲社会行为呈负相关或正相关。
本研究使用两项研究来测试不同类型的早期生活压力是否调节了年龄与亲社会行为之间的关系。
研究 1 招募了年龄在 18-35 岁之间的本科生(n=69),研究 2 则在亚马逊 Mechanical Turk 响应者(n=499)中进行,年龄范围为 18-74 岁。
研究 1 采用行为经济学任务来衡量合作和慈善性,而研究 2 则使用在线调查来衡量帮助态度。
调节分析显示,年龄与合作的关系在经历家庭暴力(β=-0.37,p=0.002)、社区暴力(β=-0.30,p=0.012)、情感虐待(β=-0.27,p=0.026)和早期生活压力的综合评分(β=-0.33,p=0.006)后显著减弱。年龄与慈善性的关系仅在家庭暴力(β=-0.24,p=0.048)后减弱。年龄与帮助态度的关系在经历家庭暴力(β=-0.10,p=0.023)、社区暴力(β=-0.13,p=0.003)和身体忽视(β=-0.11,p=0.018)后减弱。
总的来说,这些结果表明,某些类型的早期生活压力,尤其是暴露于暴力环境中,可能会降低整个生命周期中亲社会行为增加的可能性。这项研究表明,亲社会行为与年龄相关的影响可能不是普遍的,而是取决于儿童时期压力的个体差异。