Área de Urgencias, Hospital Clínic, Grupo UPyP, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, España.
Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISCC, Madrid, España.
Emergencias. 2019 Jun;31(3):167-172.
To assess the accuracy, safety, and efficiency of ultrasound images obtained by emergency physician to diagnose deep vein thrombosis (DVT). patients with acute heart failure (AHF) attended in a hospital emergency department (ED).
Prospective multicenter cohort study. We assigned patients suspected of having DVT to an intervention or control group. Emergency physicians took ultrasound images that were later evaluated by a radiologist in the intervention group. In the control group, images were evaluated only by the radiologist. We analyzed patient, physician, and episode variables. Test results, times until imaging, and 30-day adverse events were also analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and agreement between physicians and radiologists (κ statistic) were calculated.
A total of 304 patients (209 in the intervention group and 95 controls) were included. The groups were comparable. The overall prevalence of DVT was 35.5% (95% CI, 30.3-41.0). The sensitivity of ultrasound images obtained by emergency physicians was superior in relation to experience: 71.4 (95% CI, 50.0-86.0) for those in a training course, 75.0 (95% CI, 80.0-95.4) for those with at least 2 months' practical experience, and 94.7 (95% CI, 82.7-98.5) for routine users. Specificity statistics for the 3 levels of physician experience were 83.3 (95% CI 55.2- 95.2), 100 (95% CI 83.0-100), and 96.6 (95% CI 88.4-99.0), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios for ultrasound imaging by physicians were 27.94 and 0.054, respectively. The κ statistic was 0.80. Mean (SD) time until a physician took ultrasound images was 1.81 (1.46) hours versus 4.39 (1.81) hours until a radiologist obtained images (P = .007). Three deaths occurred within 30 days. They were not attributable to recurrence or bleeding.
Ultrasound images taken by emergency physicians to diagnose DVT are accurate and safe and may be efficient. However, routine experience with ultrasound is necessary.
评估急诊科医生对疑似急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者进行深静脉血栓形成(DVT)诊断的超声图像的准确性、安全性和效率。
前瞻性多中心队列研究。我们将疑似患有 DVT 的患者分配到干预组或对照组。急诊医生对患者进行超声检查,然后由放射科医生在干预组中对图像进行评估。在对照组中,仅由放射科医生评估图像。我们分析了患者、医生和发作的变量。还分析了检查结果、进行影像学检查的时间以及 30 天内的不良事件。计算了医生和放射科医生之间的检测结果(κ 统计量)的灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比以及一致性。
共纳入 304 例患者(干预组 209 例,对照组 95 例)。两组具有可比性。DVT 的总体患病率为 35.5%(95%CI,30.3-41.0)。与经验相关,急诊医生获得的超声图像的灵敏度更高:接受培训课程的医生为 71.4%(95%CI,50.0-86.0),具有至少 2 个月实践经验的医生为 75.0%(95%CI,80.0-95.4),常规使用者为 94.7%(95%CI,82.7-98.5)。3 级医生经验的特异性统计数据分别为 83.3%(95%CI 55.2-95.2)、100%(95%CI 83.0-100)和 96.6%(95%CI 88.4-99.0)。医生进行超声检查的阳性和阴性似然比分别为 27.94 和 0.054。κ 统计量为 0.80。医生进行超声检查的平均(SD)时间为 1.81(1.46)小时,而放射科医生获得图像的平均(SD)时间为 4.39(1.81)小时(P=0.007)。30 天内发生 3 例死亡。这些死亡与复发或出血无关。
急诊科医生用于诊断 DVT 的超声图像准确、安全,并且可能有效。但是,需要有常规的超声使用经验。