Suppr超能文献

产前护理利用指数充足性对美国小于胎龄儿和早产的影响。

Influence of the Adequacy of the Prenatal Care Utilization Index on Small-For-Gestational-Age Infants and Preterm Births in the United States.

作者信息

Shin Dayeon, Song Won O

机构信息

Department of Food and Nutrition, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea.

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 12;8(6):838. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060838.

Abstract

Little is known about the associations of Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants and preterm births. This study investigated the association between the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index in relation to small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants and preterm births. We used data from 212,050 pregnant women from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) between 2004 and 2011. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the effect of the APNCU index on SGA infants and preterm births after controlling for maternal sociodemographic factors. Women who received adequate-plus prenatal care in reference to adequate prenatal care had increased odds for delivering SGA infants (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.15). Women with 9-11 prenatal care visits had increased odds of delivering SGA infants (AOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.14) compared to those with more than 12 visits. Among the four APNCU index categories, the highest rate of preterm births was observed in the adequate-plus group. Compared to those with adequate prenatal care, women who received adequate-plus prenatal care had increased odds of preterm birth (AOR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.55-1.84). Compared to those with more than 12 visits, women with fewer than eight prenatal care visits had increased odds of preterm birth (AOR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.13-1.48). In conclusion, women in the adequate-plus APNCU index category were more likely to deliver SGA infants and to have preterm births compared to those in the adequate APNCU index category. Women in the U.S. with high-risk pregnancies were prone to receiving adequate-plus prenatal care. Future prospective studies are warranted to investigate the influence of APNCU index in relation to pregnancy and birth outcomes.

摘要

关于产前护理利用充分性(APNCU)指数与小于胎龄(SGA)婴儿及早产之间的关联,人们了解甚少。本研究调查了产前护理利用充分性(APNCU)指数与小于胎龄(SGA)婴儿及早产之间的关联。我们使用了2004年至2011年间来自妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)的212,050名孕妇的数据。在控制了产妇社会人口学因素后,进行多变量逻辑回归分析以检验APNCU指数对SGA婴儿和早产的影响。与接受充分产前护理相比,接受充分加量产前护理的女性分娩SGA婴儿的几率增加(调整优势比(AOR)=1.08,95%置信区间(CI)=1.03 - 1.15)。与产前检查超过12次的女性相比,产前检查9 - 11次的女性分娩SGA婴儿的几率增加(AOR = 1.07,95% CI = 1.02 - 1.14)。在APNCU指数的四个类别中,充分加量组的早产率最高。与接受充分产前护理的女性相比,接受充分加量产前护理的女性早产几率增加(AOR = 1.69,95% CI = 1.55 - 1.84)。与产前检查超过12次的女性相比,产前检查少于8次的女性早产几率增加(AOR = 1.29,95% CI = 1.13 - 1.48)。总之,与APNCU指数充分类别中的女性相比,APNCU指数充分加量类别中的女性更有可能分娩SGA婴儿并早产。美国高危妊娠的女性倾向于接受充分加量的产前护理。未来有必要进行前瞻性研究,以调查APNCU指数对妊娠和分娩结局的影响。

相似文献

2
The "Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization" (APNCU) index to study low birth weight: is the index biased?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Mar;55(3):296-305. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00471-1.
3
The association of Chinese and American antenatal care utilization indices with birth outcomes.
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;12:1420943. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420943. eCollection 2024.
4
[Comparison of 2 indexes of prenatal care and risk of preterm delivery].
Gac Sanit. 1997 May-Jun;11(3):136-42. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(97)71289-5.
6
9
Paternal country of origin and adverse neonatal outcomes in births to foreign-born women in Norway: A population-based cohort study.
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 4;17(11):e1003395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003395. eCollection 2020 Nov.
10
Prenatal smoking cessation and the risk of delivering preterm and small-for-gestational-age newborns.
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):318-325. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ae9e9c.

引用本文的文献

1
Prenatal care utilization for fetuses with spina bifida in California.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07800-z.
3
Adequate Prenatal Care and Maternal Morbidity Among Birthing People with Preexisting Comorbidities.
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Apr;29(4):504-514. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04069-8. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Black/White disparities in low birth weight across maternal trajectories of social mobility in South Carolina.
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Feb;366:117675. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117675. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
National Variation in Black Immigrant Preterm Births and the Role of County-Level Social Factors.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct 8. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02198-4.
7
The association of Chinese and American antenatal care utilization indices with birth outcomes.
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;12:1420943. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420943. eCollection 2024.
8
Preterm Birth Risk and Maternal Nativity, Ethnicity, and Race.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243194. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3194.
10
Prenatal care and infant outcomes of teenage births: a Project WATCH study.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 24;23(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05662-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Postpartum depression in adolescent and adult mothers: comparing prenatal risk factors and predictive models.
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Aug;17(6):1071-9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1089-5.
5
Inadequate prenatal care and risk of preterm delivery among adolescents: a retrospective study over 10 years.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):122.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 May 14.
8
Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a comparison of indices.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 May 1;8:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-15.
9
Management and outcomes of very low birth weight.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 17;358(16):1700-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707601.
10
Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth.
Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验