Ang Robert Edward
Department of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Asian Eye Institute, Makati City, Philippines.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 May 30;13:905-911. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S208651. eCollection 2019.
To compare the effect of induced astigmatic defocus on visual performance in pseudophakic eyes implanted with a small aperture, trifocal, or monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). The study included 44 eyes with one of four types of IOL (IC-8 IOL (AcuFocus Inc., USA); FineVision (PhysIOL SA, Belgium); AT Lisa (Carl Zeiss AG, Germany); and enVista monofocal (Bausch & Lomb, USA). For astigmatic tolerance assessment, monocular distance visual acuity was measured with cylindrical lenses (power range=0.00-2.50 diopters (D) in 0.50 D increments) added to the subjects best-corrected distance manifest refraction. The assessment was repeated on three pre-determined axes (90°, 180°, and either 45° or 135°). The magnitude of astigmatic tolerance at each defocus step was assessed by taking the difference between logMAR visual acuity at the defocus step relative to that at 0.0 D (ie, no defocus condition). Across all three axes, the reduction of mean monocular visual acuity at all defocus levels relative to no defocus was significantly smaller in IC-8 group compared to the other IOL groups. When the data was combined across all axes, the astigmatic tolerance of the IC-8 group was better than AT Lisa group from 0.50 D to 2.50 D and FineVision group from 0.50 D to 1.50 D (all <0.05, ANOVA). The IC-8 group was better than the enVista group, but not significantly (>0.05, ANOVA). Among individual orientations, statistically significant differences were seen between IC-8 IOLs and the other IOLs, with the largest difference being in the oblique axis. Astigmatic tolerance at all axes combined was 1.40 D for IC-8 IOL, 0.70 D for AT Lisa and FineVision, and 1.00 D for enVista IOLs. The small aperture IC-8 IOL showed greater tolerance to induced astigmatic defocus compared to trifocal and monofocal IOLs.
比较植入小孔径、三焦点或单焦点人工晶状体(IOL)的假晶状体眼中诱导散光性离焦对视觉性能的影响。该研究纳入了44只眼,这些眼植入了以下四种类型IOL中的一种(IC-8 IOL(美国AcuFocus公司);FineVision(比利时PhysIOL公司);AT Lisa(德国卡尔蔡司公司);以及enVista单焦点IOL(美国博士伦公司))。为了评估散光耐受性,在受试者最佳矫正远视力的基础上,添加柱面透镜(屈光度范围 = 0.00 - 2.50屈光度(D),以0.50 D递增)测量单眼远视力。在三个预定轴(90°、180°以及45°或135°)上重复该评估。通过计算离焦步骤下的logMAR视力与0.0 D(即无离焦情况)下的logMAR视力之差,来评估每个离焦步骤下的散光耐受程度。在所有三个轴上,与其他IOL组相比,IC-8组在所有离焦水平下相对于无离焦时单眼平均视力的降低显著更小。当合并所有轴的数据时,IC-8组在0.50 D至2.50 D时的散光耐受性优于AT Lisa组,在0.50 D至1.50 D时优于FineVision组(所有P<0.05,方差分析)。IC-8组优于enVista组,但差异不显著(P>0.05,方差分析)。在各个方向上,IC-8 IOL与其他IOL之间存在统计学显著差异,最大差异出现在斜轴上(45°或135°)。所有轴合并后的散光耐受性,IC-8 IOL为1.40 D,AT Lisa和FineVision为0.70 D,enVista IOL为1.00 D。与三焦点和单焦点IOL相比,小孔径IC-8 IOL对诱导散光性离焦表现出更高的耐受性。