Department of Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Psicología, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
School of Psychology, University of Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):997-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09868-7.
This cross-sectional study was aimed at investigating the role of emotional regulation in regular gambling in a sample of 197 disordered and non-problem gamblers from Ecuador. Two proxies were used as measures of behavioral signs of generalized emotion dysregulation (UPPS-P emotion-driven impulsivity) and intentional emotion regulation strategies (ERQ), and their associations with gambling cognitions (as measured by the GRCS questionnaire), gambling behavior (SOGS), and comorbid alcohol and drug misuse (MultiCAGE), were explored. For analyses, impulsivity traits, including emotion-driven impulsivity scores, were used as inputs to predict dispositional variables (ERQ strategies and GRCS cognitions), and clinically relevant behavioral outputs, while controlling for gambling severity. Hypotheses were based on previously published work, although the analysis has been improved (using hierarchical linear mixed-effects modelling), and homogenized in covariate control, and decision threshold stringency. Results were as follows: (1) After controlling for relevant covariates, UPPS-P sensation seeking was positively associated with gambling cognitions, whereas positive urgency was positively associated with cognitive biases (interpretative bias, control illusion, and predictive control) but not with other gambling cognitions. (2) Among emotion regulation strategies, reappraisal, but not suppression, was associated with gambling cognitions. (3) Negative urgency was distinctively associated with suppression, but not with reappraisal. And (4), no impulsivity dimensions significantly predicted drug or alcohol misuse, although negative urgency fell just below the decision threshold. These results reinforce the importance of emotion regulation processes in the cognitive and behavioral manifestations of gambling. Most importantly, they suggest a dissociation between the role of model-free dysregulation of negative emotions (as measured by UPPS-P negative urgency), as a key contributor to gambling complication and general psychopathology; and the one of strategic emotion regulation, in fueling gambling-related cognitive distortions.
这项横断面研究旨在调查情绪调节在厄瓜多尔 197 名障碍性和非问题赌徒样本中对习惯性赌博的作用。使用两个代理指标来衡量广泛性情绪失调的行为迹象(UPPS-P 情绪驱动冲动)和有意情绪调节策略(ERQ),并探讨它们与赌博认知(GRCS 问卷测量)、赌博行为(SOGS)和共病酒精和药物滥用(MultiCAGE)的关系。在分析中,冲动特质,包括情绪驱动冲动分数,被用作输入来预测倾向变量(ERQ 策略和 GRCS 认知)和临床相关的行为输出,同时控制赌博严重程度。假设基于先前发表的工作,尽管分析得到了改进(使用分层线性混合效应模型),并且在协变量控制和决策阈值严格性方面进行了同质化。结果如下:(1)在控制相关协变量后,UPPS-P 感觉寻求与赌博认知呈正相关,而积极冲动与认知偏差(解释偏差、控制错觉和预测控制)呈正相关,但与其他赌博认知无关。(2)在情绪调节策略中,只有再评价与赌博认知有关,而不是抑制。(3)消极冲动与抑制有关,而不是再评价。(4)没有冲动维度显著预测药物或酒精滥用,尽管消极冲动刚好低于决策阈值。这些结果强调了情绪调节过程在赌博认知和行为表现中的重要性。最重要的是,它们表明,负面情绪的无模型失调(如 UPPS-P 负冲动所测量的)作为导致赌博复杂化和一般精神病理学的关键因素,与战略情绪调节的作用不同,后者在加剧与赌博相关的认知扭曲方面起着关键作用。